i hate lexus....with a passion
[QUOTE]Originally posted by wagon89
[B]
wow you are stupid.
YOU are the one talking about how the engine was a 3 liter pumping 215, and then condemn judging a car by its 1/4 benchmark!?! I for one realize that there is more to a car than JUST its 1/4, but honestly if you're going to pay upwards of 32k, I would expect more out of the drivetrain than that.
And as far as the pic in my sig, It was photoshopped like that you nit wit.
here's the original just to make you feel a little better...
[B]
Originally posted by RB
who really cares about the 1/4 mile time? Don't go off spouting about its power if you are just going to contradict yourself by saying who cares about its times.
And your integra runs what stock with no bolt ons?
Everyone seems to think a 1/4 mile time is the benchmark of performance. When in the real world there are turns, stopping power, top speed etc. I look at things such as 50-70 acel times for freeway passing.
PS: please learn how to use a camera that pic in your post is shit
who really cares about the 1/4 mile time? Don't go off spouting about its power if you are just going to contradict yourself by saying who cares about its times.
And your integra runs what stock with no bolt ons?
Everyone seems to think a 1/4 mile time is the benchmark of performance. When in the real world there are turns, stopping power, top speed etc. I look at things such as 50-70 acel times for freeway passing.
PS: please learn how to use a camera that pic in your post is shit
wow you are stupid.
YOU are the one talking about how the engine was a 3 liter pumping 215, and then condemn judging a car by its 1/4 benchmark!?! I for one realize that there is more to a car than JUST its 1/4, but honestly if you're going to pay upwards of 32k, I would expect more out of the drivetrain than that.
And as far as the pic in my sig, It was photoshopped like that you nit wit.
here's the original just to make you feel a little better...
Originally posted by velfarretokyo
IS300 a glorified Civic? Geez people, lets get out of our 127hp econo-cars and open our eyes. Is the IS a true luxury or sports car? No, it's not, but it has absolutely nothing in common with a Civic except that they both have four wheels. And just because a car is expensive doesn't mean it has to be fast. There's a bunch of 40k 3.0 A4 and MB C320's with autos that I bet you'll smoke in your little Civic. Bottom line is you're still in a Civic, so quit whining.
IS300 a glorified Civic? Geez people, lets get out of our 127hp econo-cars and open our eyes. Is the IS a true luxury or sports car? No, it's not, but it has absolutely nothing in common with a Civic except that they both have four wheels. And just because a car is expensive doesn't mean it has to be fast. There's a bunch of 40k 3.0 A4 and MB C320's with autos that I bet you'll smoke in your little Civic. Bottom line is you're still in a Civic, so quit whining.
I wonder what you drive?

And yes the IS300 is a dressed up civic...upraded engine (barely), moved power to the rear, and added some aesthetic touches, but overall its not what you make it out to be.
Beautiful car? Absolutely. I love them.
Dressed up civic? yes.
Originally posted by RB
:jerkit:
I wonder what you drive?
And yes the IS300 is a dressed up civic...upraded engine (barely), moved power to the rear, and added some aesthetic touches, but overall its not what you make it out to be.
Beautiful car? Absolutely. I love them.
Dressed up civic? yes.
:jerkit:
I wonder what you drive?

And yes the IS300 is a dressed up civic...upraded engine (barely), moved power to the rear, and added some aesthetic touches, but overall its not what you make it out to be.
Beautiful car? Absolutely. I love them.
Dressed up civic? yes.
Originally posted by RB
And yes the IS300 is a dressed up civic...upraded engine (barely), moved power to the rear, and added some aesthetic touches, but overall its not what you make it out to be.
And yes the IS300 is a dressed up civic...upraded engine (barely), moved power to the rear, and added some aesthetic touches, but overall its not what you make it out to be.
Hmmm, I felt really stupid saying that, and so should you. :fawk:
Originally posted by RB
wow you are stupid.
YOU are the one talking about how the engine was a 3 liter pumping 215, and then condemn judging a car by its 1/4 benchmark!?! I for one realize that there is more to a car than JUST its 1/4, but honestly if you're going to pay upwards of 32k, I would expect more out of the drivetrain than that.
And as far as the pic in my sig, It was photoshopped like that you nit wit.
here's the original just to make you feel a little better...
wow you are stupid.
YOU are the one talking about how the engine was a 3 liter pumping 215, and then condemn judging a car by its 1/4 benchmark!?! I for one realize that there is more to a car than JUST its 1/4, but honestly if you're going to pay upwards of 32k, I would expect more out of the drivetrain than that.
And as far as the pic in my sig, It was photoshopped like that you nit wit.
here's the original just to make you feel a little better...
If thats a photoshop master piece as you claim it to be, you are a retard. I would have aleast claimed the camera was broken
And do your homework on the other cars the IS300 is grouped with the BMW 330i does not even have 215 HP and guess what its over $30,000 also.
Lets not also forget that the E36 M3 was out about the same time the IS300 came out and it only had 240 HP if I recall in the US spec model and it was in the high $38k plus range Yet the E36 M3 still racked up many awards from the automotive press.
You have just been owned so put your knee pads on
Don't even try, RB. The IS300 is the number 1 jock riding and dicksucking car. It's expensive, slow, and doesn't handle very well, but like the WRX (which isn't expensive but handles like soap) it has become some amazing powerhouse in the minds of ricers everywhere.


