Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

03 Civic SI vs. 03 Sentra SE-R Spec-V

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #11  
The Beav's Avatar
The Beav
i
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Default

i'd go with the impreza because subaru's are just about as reliable as hondas, it's a nice car and it's pretty easy to build for turbo if you want to go down that route
the sentra se-r is all look at me i'm cool and nothign to back it up
the civic si is pure function, and it's a hatch
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

you are going to be unimpressed with the si. you are going to be unimpressed with the 2.5 RS. GET A WRX.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #13  
sympl_RS's Avatar
sympl_RS
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: The Rez
Default

Originally posted by RB
you are going to be unimpressed with the si. you are going to be unimpressed with the 2.5 RS. GET A WRX.
You cannot get a WRX for $16-20k unless you went with a used one which is a definite :nono:
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #14  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally posted by sympl_RS
You cannot get a WRX for $16-20k unless you went with a used one which is a definite :nono:

save up then h:
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:00 AM
  #15  
Morpheus's Avatar
Morpheus
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Default

The Sentra sits liek a 4x4 with the 17's.

I'd get the Civic, stay Honda.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:24 AM
  #16  
flpngino's Avatar
flpngino
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

lol. Thanks for the advice guys. I definitely don't want to spend more than $20k. If I do, it's only if I wait till the Fall and get the CTR. hehe.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #17  
DB7 2.0's Avatar
DB7 2.0
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,043
Likes: 0
From: eL Lay, SoCal
Default

my friend has a 2.5RS....its a decent car and he's beefed up the suspension pretty damn seriously....but the engine sucks. and put a custom turbo kit on it? sure... and kiss the tranny and engine goodbye. of course, you can put on a turbo kit on it and drive it slow and cautiously and talk about how it lasted x-amount of miles, but if you drive it the way it was meant to be while on boost, its gone.

i cant stand the new Si still. id get the SE-R hands down. the CTR only manages to make the new EP "acceptable" aesthetically in my opinion. the SE-R to me delivers the best all around in looks and performance in comparison to the Si.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:35 AM
  #18  
flpngino's Avatar
flpngino
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Wow...the first pro SE-R comment. I was wondering how long it would be till someone picked it over the Si. What can't you stand about the Si, though? Is it the body style?

Originally posted by DB7 2.0
my friend has a 2.5RS....its a decent car and he's beefed up the suspension pretty damn seriously....but the engine sucks. and put a custom turbo kit on it? sure... and kiss the tranny and engine goodbye. of course, you can put on a turbo kit on it and drive it slow and cautiously and talk about how it lasted x-amount of miles, but if you drive it the way it was meant to be while on boost, its gone.

i cant stand the new Si still. id get the SE-R hands down. the CTR only manages to make the new EP "acceptable" aesthetically in my opinion. the SE-R to me delivers the best all around in looks and performance in comparison to the Si.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 09:53 AM
  #19  
DB7 2.0's Avatar
DB7 2.0
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,043
Likes: 0
From: eL Lay, SoCal
Default

Originally posted by flpngino
Wow...the first pro SE-R comment. I was wondering how long it would be till someone picked it over the Si. What can't you stand about the Si, though? Is it the body style?
let me put it this way. the only thing i like on the new Si is the steering wheel, taillights, and H badge. everything else like performance, exterior design, interior design, etc. sucks ass in my opinion. sure, the interior is designed to be very ergonomical, but it still looks like ass.. *aside from the center console shifter for just a novelty benefit* its still a civic, and the Si is supposed to be the performance model available in the states, yet its slow and weighs like a boat. the factory wheels are ugly as heck. the headlights are ugly. sure throw in some HID's and itll lessen the ugliness simply because the person will be distracted from the headlight housing design and more attentative to the light emitted itself. the seats look like retarded S2000 seats. sure, they might be comfortable, but just like the rest of the interior, its still ugly as heck. oh did i mention its slow? yeah, some people say "well its a new engine give it some time"... ok...then why is it stock for stock, my car which is a 4door integra sedan with a bone stock B20 can whoop a bone stock Si hatch? the K20 is supposed to have more torque and the wow-factor of "i-VTEC" with a shorter geared tranny. the new Si still gets a big :down: from me.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:53 PM
  #20  
Sebring_S2k's Avatar
Sebring_S2k
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Wilimington
Default

Mazdaspeed Protege? I'd go with the Civic for quality, Sentra for looks.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.