WOW!

[spoiler=spoiler]despite making the most money in the world for a movie, it walks with only 2 awards...whereas Hurt Locker walked with 5[/spoiler]

 

Actually it took 3. Art Direction, Cinematography and Special Effects... not surprisingly.

I'm kind of bummed District 9 didn't win anything. That was one of the best movies of the year... hell, of the decade.

 

I thought Hurt Locker was ok... nothing really special. :dunno:

 

Yeah that was kind of my reaction too. I saw it once in theaters and at the time I probably would have given it an 8/10 at best... maybe I'll give it another chance? h:

Admittedly, Avatar has a fairly common story and it's character development and dialogue could have been a little better... but seeing that movie in theaters really was an awesome experience. If a movie can make feel that kind of excitement while watching it, it should probably be winning the best awards. But.. I'm sure James Cameron will get over it while he's counting his millions.

 

the hurt locker awards were bullshit, quentin deserves to win director. His flick was far better than any other.

 

what movie was that? Inglorious Basterds? yeah, that was better than Hurt Locker and Avatar.

 

Pretty weak set of best films this year. None of them were clear winners. On some years, The Hurt Locker wouldn't have even been nominated. Just the way it goes, I guess.

 

Inglorious Bass turds was weak as fuck.

 

Inglorious Basterds has a great villain, suspense and dialogue... but everything else was pretty meh.

 

pretty disappointed, Star Trek only won "Best Make Up" when they messed up the only people with major costume make up, the fucked up "Romulans"