Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Well...there you have it

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:45 PM
  #11  
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Default

This year is absolute proof that the so-called "supermajority" needed to ratify the budget in CA does more harm than good.
For decades, the state functioned perfectly well on a "50 percent plus one" standard. We need a ballot measure to bring it back.
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
ShaolinLueb's Avatar
ShaolinLueb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA
Default

fuck i love how government overspends. in mass instead of budgetting, he wants to raise the gas tax by 27 cents, giving mass the highest gas tax in the state. .
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #13  
NOPD's Avatar
NOPD
Come in My Hole
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 27,444
Likes: 0
Default

good luck guys, shit is getting straight scary. I thought i might be fail safe, but we'll wait and see.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:53 PM
  #14  
Joe's Avatar
Joe
...
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,216
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

The shit is really starting to hit the fan. :hs:
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #15  
KirkLS's Avatar
KirkLS
Wannabe ///M3 owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherDave™
This year is absolute proof that the so-called "supermajority" needed to ratify the budget in CA does more harm than good.
For decades, the state functioned perfectly well on a "50 percent plus one" standard. We need a ballot measure to bring it back.
why'd they get rid of that? This is ridiculous
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #16  
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Default

Originally Posted by KirkLS
why'd they get rid of that? This is ridiculous
I honestly don't remember.
It's been on the books for quite a while, though.

EDIT: Apparently it goes back to 1933.
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/fiscal/supmjbud.htm
It's a god damn miracle the state senate gets anything done.
Oh wait...
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!

Last edited by TheOtherDave™; Feb 17, 2009 at 08:19 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #17  
Chefboiali's Avatar
Chefboiali
scrotal surge
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,460
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

I have a friend who works for a non-profit. She told me this...

Those layoffs are people who are temporary workers. What happened is the state got all of this money so they decided to increase their payrolls by adding temp workers. That way, they could get more workers but they don't have the protections of regular government employess like the benefits and guaranteed no layoff clauses in their employment contracts. They are mostly admin and clerks.....people like that. Not social workers and probation officers and "degreed" people.
Originally Posted by b00gers
And we wait and see. Part of my program / salary is paid through the state.

:uhhok:
After school programs work. h:

Crime rate for juveniles from 3:00pm to 6:00pm has dropped since the introduction of after school programs. I hope your grant writer stresses this. The ramifications of losing programs like yours would be a true recipe for destruction.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #18  
NOPD's Avatar
NOPD
Come in My Hole
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 27,444
Likes: 0
Default

my brother might be out of work from FEMA soon on top of that he'll be at home all day (he's living at my house) using up my utilities
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:51 PM
  #19  
Chefboiali's Avatar
Chefboiali
scrotal surge
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,460
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

Gov. Gray Davis in 2003 put plans in motion to lay off some 12,000 workers, sending them notices that the state had begun the lengthy process of eliminating their jobs. That process can involve six to eight months of appeal hearings, paperwork processing and negotiations between the state and unions. Those layoffs never happened either.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/01/...o/me-workers31

Seems it's not that easy to cut State workers.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
Spec R's Avatar
Spec R
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,429
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

still scary.

man wtf
__________________
DB Squad
Integra Forum Moderator
2016 BMW 340i M-Sport / 2013 Chevrolet Volt / 1999 Subaru Impreza RS EJ205
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM.