This is a funny argument because if you look it up you will find that there are chemicals in cig smoke that are put out that have yet to be identified...so no they aren't disclosing everything about it.

Marijuana on the other hand has had all of it's chemical output from smoking identified and none have anywhere near the carcinogenic quantities that tobacco does.

Driving under the influence is a blanket law covering the influence of everything from alcohol to weed to prescription pills. Usually with weed you end up 15 under the speed limit and a blinker on 2 miles before you turn.

 

Your friends are extreme pot heads.

 

I have proven you wrong many times over when I was younger at a ratio of 3:1 at least.

 

You can't overdose on weed, It's literally impossible. It's obviously not good for your lungs but there is absolutely no link between lung cancer and cannabis use alone. The worst that could happen is you get bronchitis if you're a heavy user.

 

yea but you stopped right?
people who smoke ciggarettes are about a 1-2 pack a day smoker for years until they start showing signs of cancer... so thats between 20-40 cigarettes a day, your telling me that you could smoke 20-40 marijuana cigarettes a day when u were younger?

 

lots of miseducated souls in here.

 

you cant overdose on cigarettes either. that wasnt my point.

 

Its funny that he said he felt like he was going slower. I dunno. I've never driven high because I still don't have a tolerance and am not used to the effects yet.
It seems like he would be feeling like he is going faster.

 

Since we're on the subject, I highly recommend people watch this documentary:

The Union: The business behind getting high.
http://zebb.blip.tv/#1362521

Really interesting movie. I wish everyone could see this.

 

Splift? Is that like a joint or is that like a splitter?