Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Even my Liberal ass thinks this is a good idea.

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #21  
Just Janna's Avatar
Just Janna
Thread Starter
Cake or Death?
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 20,749
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by NOPD
welfare pays the bills.
I've gotten unemployment before.. there's nothing wrong with that. There is something wrong with abusing the system though. h:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #22  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

unemployment != welfare
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #23  
v6_accord_jerz's Avatar
v6_accord_jerz
Stupid Power Ball
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,619
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Werd..........I feel 4/10 on welfare actually use it to get back on the their. Everyone else abuses it, sit back, kick their feet up and expect to get spoon fed forever.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #24  
fathergoat's Avatar
fathergoat
:3
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
From: BFE
Default

Is there a test for laziness? I think that would be far more effective.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #25  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by fathergoat
Is there a test for laziness? I think that would be far more effective.
To answer that you have to... eff it.. someone else answer it h:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #26  
fathergoat's Avatar
fathergoat
:3
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by RicoD
To answer that you have to... eff it.. someone else answer it h:
you failed the test
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #27  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
So do a random test for people that are collecting. If they choose not to take the test, or they fail, cut them off. And it doesn't have to be everyone, just a select few. It will get the message out there that you could lose your check if you are selected and pop.
I agree. I think random testing would be good...however, I can hear the NAACP already...crying foul play for targeting minorities.

Kind of hard to target minorities when they are the majority receiving welfare h:

Originally Posted by reno96teg
i think having millions of people on welfare is scarier than the cost of a million tests.
You and me both, man.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #28  
skabone69's Avatar
skabone69
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

what would stop someone from sending their cousin or other family member to take the test for them? people on welfare will always find the loophole to exploit the system. there will never be a perfect way to solve the problem unless you shut down the system and force people to go out an get a job themselves. most people will try to get a job while others will become bums because they are lazy. Welfare is such a drain on the economy, especially since illegal mexicans can get on it easily. I'd love to see them blow up the whole system and take away all the programs and have people fend for themselves. Crime would go up initally but people adapt, and it would get better.
I'd make sure I'd have a conseal to carry permit though.h:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #29  
DarkStarr's Avatar
DarkStarr
Shake n Bake!
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,794
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by v6_accord_jerz
Werd..........I feel 4/10 on welfare actually use it to get back on the their. Everyone else abuses it, sit back, kick their feet up and expect to get spoon fed forever.
I was gonna use it to get back on my feet, and also take a few weeks at the taxpayers expense.. but I found a job therefor not needing it
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #30  
Fire's Avatar
Fire
wanna run
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Default

What they should do is have the people on welfare truly prove they are searching for gainful employment. When someone is employed, instead of just cutting off the welfare all together it should be scaled down to fit need of the family for a set amount of time. This would provide incentive to actually keep a job instead of bailing once one figures out that the welfare check provides the same amount of money with zero work (low income employment). Obviously this would have to be coupled with a time limit set on how long one can receive a welfare check and about a million other details not worth outlining in a post-but it would reduce the number of people receiving full welfare benefits (and wean them off altogether with time) and force the unemployed to seek a change.

Last edited by Fire; Dec 17, 2007 at 02:41 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 PM.