Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Even my Liberal ass thinks this is a good idea.

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #11  
Just Janna's Avatar
Just Janna
Thread Starter
Cake or Death?
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 20,749
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by RB
The expense would be astronomical.
Take it out of their check. h:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #12  
JCEN's Avatar
JCEN
Z0chicks
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,387
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

bums would be too lazy to take said drug test anyways
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Civilian
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 1
From: Miami Beach. FL
Default

Originally Posted by RB
I think testing once would be completely pointless.

1.) It's not that hard to fudge a drug test.
2.) It's not that hard to get clean for a month, take the test, then pick up the habit again.
3.) Unlike employment, where your employer tends to have direct contact with you on a daily basis and can monitor for signs of drug use, welfare recipients don't encounter case workers on a regular basis.


Regular drug testing would be essential to make the concept of drug testing for government handouts valid, and doing so would cost a fortune.
So do a random test for people that are collecting. If they choose not to take the test, or they fail, cut them off. And it doesn't have to be everyone, just a select few. It will get the message out there that you could lose your check if you are selected and pop.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #14  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RB
If you're looking at millions of tests done monthly, I highly doubt that.
i think having millions of people on welfare is scarier than the cost of a million tests.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #15  
BetterBob's Avatar
BetterBob
Nobama
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,961
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
So do a random test for people that are collecting. If they choose not to take the test, or they fail, cut them off. And it doesn't have to be everyone, just a select few. It will get the message out there that you could lose your check if you are selected and pop.
The whole thing sounds like a great idea. Should be nation wide.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:37 PM
  #16  
NOPD's Avatar
NOPD
Come in My Hole
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 27,444
Likes: 0
Default

Here we go again.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #17  
v6_accord_jerz's Avatar
v6_accord_jerz
Stupid Power Ball
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,619
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Just Janna
Take it out of their check. h:
LOLz Amen to that. :chuckles:
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by NOPD
Here we go again.
You're just saying that because your side job would go down hill
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #19  
v6_accord_jerz's Avatar
v6_accord_jerz
Stupid Power Ball
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,619
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by NOPD
Here we go again.
Are you getting a check? :squint:




Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #20  
NOPD's Avatar
NOPD
Come in My Hole
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 27,444
Likes: 0
Default

welfare pays the bills.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:55 PM.