yes.

 

morals have nothing to do with the law... i find it is imoral to keep and animal in a cage, but does that mean it should be illigal? My moral, your morals dont have anything to do with this.

I am not saying it should be socially accepted... i am agaisnt it for sure. but i dont think it's up to the court to descide.

 

hello and welcome to the seat belt argument in 1975.

 

:eh:even when it can have devastating consequences on society?

 

seriously dude stop it with the canda bullshit you keep shitting on real thread with this shit man... In canada Inbreeding is illigale actually our laws are strickter then in the US so shut the fuck up already with that shit.

 

Really? I thought upholding public interest is exactly why the courts are in place

FACT: Incest generally produces offspring with a much higher likelihood of physical/mental defect

Public interest = As few retarded people as possible.

See the argument?

 

this is bound to get good

 

definitely not a 'k' in stricter.

 

what? you beleive that morals should be part of the law? Only a few selected people in a country actually makes the law, does that mean that they decide what is moral and what isint?

If so that would mean that you aggree with the Sharia... cause those are all about moiralities.

Common dude... Morals should not be part of the legal system.

 

The dude in this situation is steril... so your argument is not longer valid