THE AUTOMATICS FOR THIS MODEL ARE PRONE TO FAILURE.

Otherwise I wouldn't give a fuck.

I pray to God I don't have to reiterate this again.

Page 3 ownage teehee :reechy:

 

NOT EVERYONE READS EVERY POST IN EVERY THREAD.

 

if you're commenting to ignore the haters, but don't know what the haters are saying, that might be a problem.

 

And this is why I love RB.

 

I read over a few posts and they pretty much summed up Automatics = :down: Sorry if I don't want to waste my time reading through garbage comments from 16 year old's who think a 5spd anything is better than an Automatic.

I know plenty of people with that gen Accord who've never had any transmission issues. If you drive it like it should be driven, it's likely to last like it should.

 

My 52 year old Aunt has a 1999 sedan who just had the transmission replaced at 72,000 miles.

 

I know some people that have DSMs that never had crank walk, but that doesn't mean it isn't an issue. Stop being a bitch.

 

My mom is 49, last I checked her's was around 85k. :hsdunno: No problems yet, all maintenance completed by Honda.

 

I guess my arguement is null and void then. Silly me.

 

Honda claimed the failure percent at 2%.....

i also know a few 6th gen owners with to tranny problems what so ever.

but thanks for the heads up