ford ranger + 22's + s2000 motor =

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:29 PM

#41

puffy

bow down to king puffy

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 8,694

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by 95SiR

i feel sorry for the engine

I feel sorry for the truck :fawk:

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:29 PM

#42

AcuraFanatic

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 37,274

Likes: 0

From: Southern NH

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightshade

Duhhhhh...airbags bring it to ride height.

Inner fenderwells can be eliminated if he wants to turn at that height :slap:

Some people just don't get it.

I wouldn't have chosen that engine though. That thing is gonna be beyond slow.

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:32 PM

#43

19.3secS2K

Thread Starter

my bum is on the swedish!

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 10,133

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio, Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by AF

Some people just don't get it.

I wouldn't have chosen that engine though. That thing is gonna be beyond slow.

I think the only reason he chose it was RWD....

its still a shame...

if I was doing this, I would've gone with the 3.2 out of the nsx. go for glory

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:33 PM

#44

Chefboiali

scrotal surge

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 15,460

Likes: 0

From: Cali

I typed (lowrider) in yahoo images, and this was the first link. :rofl:

**NWS**

http://images.search.yahoo.com/searc...f22ee&ei=UTF-8

oh shit... that's long:run:

Last edited by Chefboiali; Dec 6, 2006 at 01:35 PM.

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:34 PM

#45

RicoD

Pull my finger

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 41,423

Likes: 0

From: Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18secFerio

I think the only reason he chose it was RWD....

its still a shame...

if I was doing this, I would've gone with the 3.2 out of the nsx. go for glory

2jznoshit ftw

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:34 PM

#46

AcuraFanatic

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 37,274

Likes: 0

From: Southern NH

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18secFerio

I think the only reason he chose it was RWD....

its still a shame...

if I was doing this, I would've gone with the 3.2 out of the nsx. go for glory

Wouldn't work without a lab of fabrication. I would have done a 2JZ.

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:36 PM

#47

19.3secS2K

Thread Starter

my bum is on the swedish!

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 10,133

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio, Texas

at this point, any engine other than ford would be too much work.

he should have dropped the exploder's 5.0 v8....

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:38 PM

#48

clickwir

Floppy Death! noES!!!

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 21,218

Likes: 0

From: Scranton, PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18secFerio

hate to say it, but 7 inches is nothing to brag about.

Who said I was bragging, just saying I've been working on it for years. Not that it's getting bigger.

reading comprehension > you

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:39 PM

#49

shirley

CBOTY 2010

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 34,786

Likes: 0

From: MI

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18secFerio

at this point, any engine other than ford would be too much work.

he should have dropped the exploder's 5.0 v8....

drop the 4.6 in there.....more aftermarket performance support than the late 90's early 00's exploder motors

Dec 6, 2006 | 01:39 PM

#50

Nightshade

un-Touch'd krew

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 51,774

Likes: 1

From: My own level of hell

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18secFerio

at this point, any engine other than ford would be too much work.

he should have dropped the exploder's 5.0 v8....

Warping aluminum heads ftl.

I would have stayed with the stock V6 but then it hits side clearance issues.
V8 would be fun but much larger than the v6 is.
I6 would be perfect
4 banger would be prime since speed is not really a goal and it just has to get down the road.

__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."

Reply Share

First
Prev
5 / 8
Next
Last

Forum Jump