Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Am I the only one...

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 09:04 AM
  #81  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally Posted by Spec R
butttt my only quirk is, if Honda intentionally reduced torque knowing they could have eeked more out of the setup, then why did they choose a higher (numerically) final drive (a common honda "niche" to make up for lack of torque)?
Id think that a taller final drive would only increase the feeling of horsepower because the engine would go through the rev range faster, not torque.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #82  
Spec R's Avatar
Spec R
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,429
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Id think that a taller final drive would only increase the feeling of horsepower because the engine would go through the rev range faster, not torque.
a taller final drive means its numerically lower. at least from what I learned in school and wherever else. So i'm not too sure what you're talking about.
__________________
DB Squad
Integra Forum Moderator
2016 BMW 340i M-Sport / 2013 Chevrolet Volt / 1999 Subaru Impreza RS EJ205
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #83  
redgoober4life's Avatar
redgoober4life
I eat plastic.
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Nelson
I was THIS || close in buying a Wicked White Evo IX.
My friend has an MR. I certainly don't complain whenever I'm offered the opportunity to drive a WRX/STI/EVO.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #84  
aux's Avatar
aux
More Black on Black Crime
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 37,776
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

i want a toyota xrunner
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 AM.