Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

.999999 = 1

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #71  
clickwir's Avatar
clickwir
Thread Starter
Floppy Death! noES!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 0
From: Scranton, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Jani
saying .9... = 1 is not the same as saying .9 approaches 1 or the limit = 1.
exactly, they are diffrent. They cannot be accuratly compared.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #72  
Brar's Avatar
Brar
|:]
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jani
shut up whore.... you havent taken any calc :squint:
high level calc
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #73  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Jani
saying .9... = 1 is not the same as saying .9 approaches 1 or the limit = 1.
That's a semantics argument.

More rigorously then

0.9999... lim as number of 9's -> inf = 1
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #74  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

edit: nevermind
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #75  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

the fact that the guy uses these nonsensical proofs as his irrefutable argument is proof instead that he's full of shit, even if what it's trying to argue is indeed true.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #76  
Buyimports2's Avatar
Buyimports2
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reno96teg
the fact that the guy uses these nonsensical proofs as his irrefutable argument is proof instead that he's full of shit, even if what it's trying to argue is indeed true.
I agree with the equation he made because his doesn't round and uses common algebraic manipulations for his proof. I don't think it's nonsensical.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #77  
clickwir's Avatar
clickwir
Thread Starter
Floppy Death! noES!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 0
From: Scranton, PA
Default

.999 is not the same thing as saying 1.

It doesn't matter what this jackhole uses for an equation. When people mean 1, they say 1. They don't say .9999 repeating, but it's close enough.

1.999 repeating is not 2. Just adding .99 repeating to any number does not make it equal to that number. They are simply diffrent numbers, therefore, not able to be equal to each other.

There are simply some equations that are not 100% precise. This guy takes advantage of those to try and prove something that is just simply wrong.

Some portion of some number is not equal to the whole of that number, no matter how close it gets to being a whole, it's not a whole until it is 1. Untill you make it a 1, it's just a portion of 1.

Last edited by clickwir; Jun 20, 2006 at 12:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #78  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by reno96teg
the fact that the guy uses these nonsensical proofs as his irrefutable argument is proof instead that he's full of shit, even if what it's trying to argue is indeed true.
:werd:
He's a jackhole, no doubt about it
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #79  
Grifter's Avatar
Grifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 44,835
Likes: 0
From: the southwest
Default

not this shit again
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #80  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

Where are the boobies?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 AM.