400rwhpFirebird

1/4 mile results: 13.9@100mph
0-60 results: 5.5 seconds

260hp/260 ft-lbs of torque. And its Turbo'd from the factory.

Now whether you hate GM or not, i dont see how anyone can argue that this is not a cool car. It does everything the S2000 does, and does it better.

And this makes the S2000 look bland as hell looks-wise also.

Nelson

The Sky has a lot of potential.

400rwhpFirebird

I agree. I do like the S2000 too, dont get me wrong. Theyre great cars. But i think i would pick this over the S2000.

Joe

You could say the Sky's the limit :chuckles:





























:exnbp:

AP2

Oh yes, because the S2000 IS ALL ABOUT THE QUARTER MILE.

LABARINTH

I'll admit it is a cool car...but just something about it being a Saturn keeps me from liking it a lot. It is a step in the right direction for the company IMO.

JGordon

Considering that the S2000 is now a 6-year old vehicle, I should hope the Sky outperforms it. I doubt it will have that "track ready" handling the S2000 is known for, however. Isn't the Skye supposed to be the comfort-oriented version, while the Solstice is the more sport-oriented version?

I really like the way the Sky looks, I just don't think I could ever buy a Saturn. I've had friends who have had terrible dealership experiences with them, and the Saturn name just screams "low rent" at me. Use the Solstice's suspension tuning, the Sky's sheetmetal, and an Opel badge, and I'd buy one.

Nelson

It'd be a really tough choice between the two, but I'd lean towards the S for proven build quality and reliability.

Oh boy :doh:

RB

It's GM :hsdunno:

aux

werd. they simply dont appeal to me.