Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Judas as hero

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #1  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default Judas as hero

Ancient text paints Judas as hero, says National Geographic
Last Updated Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:51:06 EDT
CBC News

Judas, the disciple blamed for betraying Jesus Christ to the Romans, was a hero, a newly released ancient text says.

National Geographic revealed Thursday what it calls the Gospel of Judas, a 1,700-year-old text which reverses the accepted view of the religious villain.
The 1,700-year-old script is written in Coptic, an ancient Egyptian language. (Associated Press)

"Jesus Christ asks Judas to betray him to the authorities," National Geographic said in a story about the 26-page text posted on its website.

In the Bible's New Testament Gospels, Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver, and then stricken by remorse, returned the bribe and committed suicide.

But the codex, or ancient book, says Jesus asked Judas to betray him.

In the text, Jesus tells Judas: "'You will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.'"

In that passage, "Jesus says it is necessary for someone to free him finally from his human body, and he prefers that this liberation be done by a friend rather than by an enemy," said Rodolphe Kasser, a clergyman, a former professor at the University of Geneva in Switzerland and head of the translation team.

"So he asks Judas, who is his friend, to sell him out, to betray him. It's treason to the general public, but between Jesus and Judas, it's not treachery."

The text is expected to be controversial because it contradicts nearly 2,000 years of Christian thought.

National Geographic said in the early days of Christianity there were competing doctrines, and the codex probably reflects the thinking of the Gnostics, a group that hid its writings when they were denounced by the established church.

The manuscript was mentioned around AD 180 by Bishop Irenaeus of Lyon, who called it fictitious.

"Let a vigorous debate on the significance of this fascinating ancient text begin," Rev. Donald Senior, president of the Catholic Theological Union of Chicago, told the Associated Press.

Appears real

The text, written in Coptic script, is believed to be a translation of an original Greek text written by Christians before AD 180.

In was found in Egypt in the 1970s, and an antique dealer tried to sell it several times, including to Yale University. But Yale declined, doubting its provenance.

The codex was finally transferred to the Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art, based in Basel, Switzerland, which worked with the National Geographic Society and the Waitt Institute for Historical Discovery in California to restore, translate and publish the book.

The University of Arizona carbon-dated five tiny samples of papyrus and leather binding to between AD 220 and AD 340, and other tests backed up that conclusion.

Pages were put on display at the National Geographic Society's headquarters in Washington, which has also published Coptic and English versions of the text. The codex will later be sent to Egypt.

link

Last edited by Tark; Apr 6, 2006 at 01:49 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:51 PM
  #2  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Whoa....
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
goon54's Avatar
goon54
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: chicago,il
Default

good stuff.. just in time for the davince code movie release too
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #4  
CRAIGHIMSELF's Avatar
CRAIGHIMSELF
Be good
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,842
Likes: 0
From: Sloppy onshore junk.
Default

This is the only physical document that Ive seen that original. This is pretty interesting. I read about this earlier and was like :O
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

what i dont get is that the article says
"The manuscript was mentioned around AD 180 by Bishop Irenaeus of Lyon, who called it fictitious."
Yet it also says
"The University of Arizona carbon-dated five tiny samples of papyrus and leather binding to between AD 220 and AD 340, and other tests backed up that conclusion."
i dont get it?

Also i didnt know how to put the pic in the article so here it is...
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #6  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tark
what i dont get is that the article says

Yet it also says

i dont get it?

It was mentioned by him, they this was written.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #7  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
It was mentioned by him, they this was written.
huh?!?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #8  
CRAIGHIMSELF's Avatar
CRAIGHIMSELF
Be good
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,842
Likes: 0
From: Sloppy onshore junk.
Default

Originally Posted by Tark
what i dont get is that the article says

Yet it also says

i dont get it?

Also i didnt know how to put the pic in the article so here it is...
Roughly. 100 years in geographical time isnt that long.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #9  
RicoD's Avatar
RicoD
Pull my finger
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41,423
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Tark
huh?!?
yea marshy took the retard pill this morning and now he cant write h:
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #10  
TaekOne's Avatar
TaekOne
pronounced tech
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 0
From: down at Va Beach
Default

from what i remember, the 4 gospel books that are in the new testament were written between 40-75 AD. its known that there a bunch of other "gospel" texts that were written, but werent included in what is now the bible b/c they were found to be written beyond that time frame (i.e. 100+AD). if this thing was written even as early as 150 AD, i wouldnt have a hard time assuming it would have some crucial differences along w/ less credibility. plus the fact that national geographic says it came from w/in the religious group, the Gnostics, which had a totally different worldview from the early church.

dont ask me how i know all this h:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM.