Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

songbird vs iTunes

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #31  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

Originally Posted by 97civicEXVTEC
I wonder if that works for Windows 98 :rick:
:rofl: Funny joke.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #32  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Songbird is past v1 now, and theres a few bugs, but pretty much it's flippin awesome

this is not for those of you with little ram though, as there's a noted memory leak issue that needs to be fixed
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #33  
strykernyc's Avatar
strykernyc
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,339
Likes: 1
From: new york city
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Can't believe I beat grifter to a software release :crazyr:

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/02/08...e_open_so.html

The big thing I see that I like is that it monitors folders for added media and automatically adds it to the file listing
Almost a twin of MediaMonkey.
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #34  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by strykernyc
Almost a twin of MediaMonkey.
With a few big differences, such as being under the GPL, being cross platform, and being built on top of the Mozilla XUL platform (think Firefox)
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 06:17 AM
  #35  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Yeah songbird sucks and mozilla sucks too. Memory leaks seem to be their strong suit anymore
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #36  
Jafro's Avatar
Jafro
I'm made of meat!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

uhm... Lemmie get this straight... you can connect to any download service except the iTunes store? And it's not supporting iPods? :squint: How is this better?

If it could do those 2 things, then I see a purpose because non-Apple devices don't support DRM (which Apple has already admitted it hates DRM but it's hand was forced by the RIAA) and if you have a jukebox-type device, you're fokked with trying to play DRM encoded doo doo. Well, the iTunes application is what applies the DRM code, not the web store. If you could connect to iTunes store without the actualy iTunes app, and buy music that you can save without DRM... then there's a purpose. Otherwise, this is going to be a steaming pile of obsoleteware because there isn't yet a webstore that can beat iTunes' selection.

I'm all for competition and progress, but if this thing doesn't support all devices and media consortiums, it's worthless. iPods make up over 75% of the digital music player market. Why cater to Zune users? All 12 of them?
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #37  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

it supports ipods through an add-on, just connect the ipod and the installer should pick up on it..


+who buys music online?

I'm waiting for 2.0, which shouldn't be that far off once people start using it
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:10 AM.