goodbye honda
the 300 with upgraded suspension should handle much better. as for the bogging on the low end, i'd think that a supercharger on a 6cyl would be the way to go. a SRI might help the low end a little, but intakes and exhuasts generally only help when the airflow is getting in the engines way, at the top end.
Originally Posted by sherwood
the 300 with upgraded suspension should handle much better. as for the bogging on the low end, i'd think that a supercharger on a 6cyl would be the way to go. a SRI might help the low end a little, but intakes and exhuasts generally only help when the airflow is getting in the engines way, at the top end.
Originally Posted by AF
Fuck a supercharger, 2JZ bottom end an a T88H :rick:
there are a lot of options for forced induction as the engine is the same engine in the NA supra, and can handle boost very well... I was thinking a supercharger down the line for its combination of low end grunt and reliability... plus if you do it right, you can hit well over 300 rwhp on 7-8 pounds of boost and moderate tuning. Right now, i don't want to void the warranty, and I'm a little low on cash after my purchase... a few years down the line though, the go fast stuff begins... I'm glad you all like the is300... it was this or an evo 8, and I think this is more practical
Originally Posted by sherwood
i honestly dont think i could buy a car with a macpherson suspension...
Edit: (To the OP) By the way, that's a very nice car
Originally Posted by Cosmo M3
E36 and E46 M3s have McPherson in the front
Originally Posted by Kestrel
A well designed MacPherson strut system loses nothing to a double wishbone suspension.
Edit: (To the OP) By the way, that's a very nice car
Edit: (To the OP) By the way, that's a very nice car

Originally Posted by sherwood
it's more of a feeling rather than a performance thing. it's weird but for some reason i can tell the difference and i just dont like it.



h: