Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Answer this question...

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #111  
Brar's Avatar
Brar
|:]
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by b00gers
A plane is standing on runway that can move (some sort of band conveyer). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in opposite direction).

The question is:

Will the plane take off or not? Will it be able to run up and take off?
read wat i said, and read that again. both plane and belt r moving at the same speed, how is a HUGE plane suposed to travel forward and create lift? and u guys r underestimating the tires purpose. read back to my treadmill post.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #112  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by [Damnit]
read wat i said, and read that again. both plane and belt r moving at the same speed, how is a HUGE plane suposed to travel forward and create lift? and u guys r underestimating the tires purpose. read back to my treadmill post.
so what purpose do the tires serve?

unlike the treadmill, the plane's tires are not used to accelerate the plane, they just hold it up and allow it to move freely horizontally.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #113  
Brar's Avatar
Brar
|:]
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,182
Likes: 0
Default

ok read the question. the belt is tuned to the speed of the plane. so even if u increase the thrust, the belts speed will also increase. tell me, how can something create lift and speed if the thing holding it up cant move forward
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #114  
Brar's Avatar
Brar
|:]
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,182
Likes: 0
Default

i shall respond to anything in the morning, good night
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #115  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

the plane only rolls on the wheels, the ground/belt isnt used to accelerate the plane.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #116  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DakarM
Insteads of using speed like you're doing use distance. as soon as the plane moves 1inch the belt will return the plane to it's original position. The belt system will continue to do so no matter how fast the plane tries to accelerate.

That is what the question is saying no?
I believe that is probably the original intention of the question. But since I committed myself to my answer, I feel I should explain more h:

Ok so let's think about it the way you're thinking about it. Now, let's say we have a brick, and we're standing at a conveyor belt like at the grocery store. The brick is basically the plane with the brakes on; it can't roll against the conveyor. Now, let's just say for imagining it that the conveyor belt moves at a constant speed, like at the store. So, let's say you push the brick forward an inch. The conveyor moves it back an inch, just like you said. But, as you apply more and more force on the brick (which is similar to the thrust the plane's engines apply to the plane), you can hold it in a steady position, even though the conveyor belt moves in the opposite direction. If you apply even more force, it will start to move the opposite direction of the conveyor belt. Now, imagine that we adjust the speed of the conveyor belt. If the belt moves slowly, then you have to apply less force to get the brick to move against the belt. If the belt moves faster, you apply more force. The amount of force you need to apply is related to the amount of friction between the brick and the conveyor belt. If the brick were on wheels (ie like a plane on wheels), you would need even less force to move it against the belt.

That is the essence of the argument. The only thing holding the plane back is the rolling resistance drag from the wheels to the conveyor belt. As long as the engine is capable of generating enough thrust to push against the rolling resistance, the plane will accelerate.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #117  
Grifter's Avatar
Grifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 44,835
Likes: 0
From: the southwest
Default

you guys are turning this into the .9 == 1 argument
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #118  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by [Damnit]
do u realize how much momentum is required to create lift for these passenger planes? And a freaken pilot said no! AND they are HUGE!


most of u r smart, but not street smart. get ur face out of the books and look at reality. actually, even in theory, it still wouldnt fly. this thing isnt a freaken fighter jet which creates thrust out of no where! i mean, even those need a runway (small but they still count). it needs its momentum and speed over a distance. as i said before which no one read i guess, do u EVER see a plane launching into the air from a dead stop? NO they travel, and pick up speed/lift THEN proceed to the flying.
Did you read any of the explanations? The planes don't just pick themselves off the ground, it accelerates even though the conveyor belt moves. And fighter jets use these things called JET ENGINES to magically create thrust. And fortunately for us, the US military was kind enough to let us use them on commercial and private planes to also magically create thrust.

And what does this have to do with street smarts? It's an imaginary situation that will never happen in real life. This is, by definition, a book problem.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #119  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Grifter
you guys are turning this into the .9 == 1 argument
Just answering the question h:
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #120  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
I believe that is probably the original intention of the question. But since I committed myself to my answer, I feel I should explain more h:
...


That is the essence of the argument. The only thing holding the plane back is the rolling resistance drag from the wheels to the conveyor belt. As long as the engine is capable of generating enough thrust to push against the rolling resistance, the plane will accelerate.
muthafawkin:werd:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 AM.