Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

NWS: Recycling Video... (must watch)

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
GotJDM?'s Avatar
GotJDM?
Thread Starter
No longer a Honda Driver.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
From: H-A basement
Default NWS: Recycling Video... (must watch)

Do you recycle?
Why do you recycle?
Just watch the video.... Penn and Teller, tell how it is. NWS because of cussing.

http://www.stuntcook.com/index.php?i=10299
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:01 PM
  #2  
MPerson's Avatar
MPerson
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,703
Likes: 0
From: Eastern MA
Default

Is this the one where they time the people and ask them to put everything in colorcoded bins?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #3  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Definitely a one sided arguement. It's incredibly easy to pick and choose facts to support your case, but I bet if that were argued by a competent and knowledgable environmentalist, it would be torn to shreds.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #4  
GotJDM?'s Avatar
GotJDM?
Thread Starter
No longer a Honda Driver.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
From: H-A basement
Default

^no
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
canada's Avatar
canada
514.315.407.405
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 23,370
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY... again.
Default

Thats funny as shit...

but at least I still feel good
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #6  
mayonaise's Avatar
mayonaise
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by GotJDM?
^no
recycling is not motivated by economic purposes, it is motivated by environmental purposes. that recycling may use more resources is troubling, but is a problem with our current process, not the concept behind recycling itself. reusing artificial materials (plastic, glass, aluminum cans) that would take tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years (or more) to decompose on their own would be extremely valuable. doesn't mean we have the process nailed down, but it's still worth investing time and money into if it can be made more efficient.

the fact that it costs more money is a non issue. i'm willing to spend a little more money if it means the environment can be a little healthier. people that don't care about the earth's environment or place money before it make me sick.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #7  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

I agree. The video fails to mention where this "extra energy" is being generated from. If they are renewable sources, then the extra energy is a non-issue. Not to mention that they didn't even bring up the fact that creating new products as opposed to recycling existing ones requires the use of non renewable sources, namely oil, in their production.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #8  
Tobra's Avatar
Tobra
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 0
From: Sacramelto, home after 10 years in Texas
Default

I don't know if all their arguments hold any water, but I can tell you that it does save a significant amount of energy and resources to recycle paper, aluminum and steel cans. This is a simple fact. If it were not, you sure as hell could not get any cash for scrap metal or paper. Here in America, private businesses will not pay you more than something is worth. I could not say about plastic, but the raw material for making plastic is petroleum, which we should probably be more careful how we use.

The impetus of this little movie seems to be the report that this government guy put out saying we were running out of landfill space. Just because some government stooge says someting, does not make it true(eg, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman")

I like Penn&Teller, funny sons of bitches, loved their HBO show, Bullshit!, which very likely is the source of this little vignette. That said, they are largely full of shit on this one.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #9  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

the problem with enviromentalists is they are idealists and they cant take anythign short of perfect.

we wouldnt need recycling if more of our stuff was biodegradable... but we cant make biodegradable things becasue treehuggers wont let us use paper... honestly they are a bunch of whining idiots that really need to learn how to compromise.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #10  
iDs's Avatar
iDs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Default

lol, pretty good video.

be cool if we could figure a way to fill up new orleans so it be more above sea level and be safe for the environment
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 PM.