View Poll Results: Did we land on the moon?
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll
Moon Landing Hoax
ch1x0r
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by BonzoAPD
hmm kinda like the government's conspiracy theory about the wmd's too :reechy:
pukimonster
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by JasonHONDA
1. Several pictures that anybody with even a little photo editing experience could tell (having cross hairs behind objects in the picture)
2. The very intense radiation that they would never make it through.
3. How heavily guarded area 51 is...what could they possibly be hiding there?
4. The flag waving in the atmosphereless space.
5. No blast crator underneath the lunar lander.
6. No stars in any of the pictures.
Want me to keep going?
2. The very intense radiation that they would never make it through.
3. How heavily guarded area 51 is...what could they possibly be hiding there?
4. The flag waving in the atmosphereless space.
5. No blast crator underneath the lunar lander.
6. No stars in any of the pictures.
Want me to keep going?
2: Radiation? Yes. Intense? No. The flux isn't high enough to harm you. People who visit the former Chernobyl(sp?) area are exposed to more radiation than the astronauts in the radiation belts. That, and they didn't stay in the radiation belts for a long period of time.
3: Area 51 = military testing site. We don't want al-queda, etc. watching us there.
4: I think that somebody already told you that there was a horizontal wire running thru the top of the flag.
5: No atmosphere = faster dissipation of exhaust gasses.
6: See #1.
ch1x0r
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,629
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by brtecson
1: When processing images taken on a black/white film camera, thick, dark, black spots will bleed onto white.
2: Radiation? Yes. Intense? No. The flux isn't high enough to harm you. People who visit the former Chernobyl(sp?) area are exposed to more radiation than the astronauts in the radiation belts. That, and they didn't stay in the radiation belts for a long period of time.
3: Area 51 = military testing site. We don't want al-queda, etc. watching us there.
4: I think that somebody already told you that there was a horizontal wire running thru the top of the flag.
5: No atmosphere = faster dissipation of exhaust gasses.
6: See #1.
2: Radiation? Yes. Intense? No. The flux isn't high enough to harm you. People who visit the former Chernobyl(sp?) area are exposed to more radiation than the astronauts in the radiation belts. That, and they didn't stay in the radiation belts for a long period of time.
3: Area 51 = military testing site. We don't want al-queda, etc. watching us there.
4: I think that somebody already told you that there was a horizontal wire running thru the top of the flag.
5: No atmosphere = faster dissipation of exhaust gasses.
6: See #1.
pukimonster
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
Merry christmas, and a happy new year.
http://badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
and area 51 has nothing to do with NASA, and also has nothing to do with this conversation. i can tell you what they are hiding there though.
http://badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
and area 51 has nothing to do with NASA, and also has nothing to do with this conversation. i can tell you what they are hiding there though.
h:
pukimonster
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
And just for the record, I accidentally voted "no" on the poll. I thought the poll was asking if the moon landings are a hoax. I really need to start reading the threads better....
edit: so the actual current count is 16 yae, 4 nae.
edit: so the actual current count is 16 yae, 4 nae.