Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

w00t! New glass

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 05:48 AM
  #11  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by DaKarMaul
IS one? or does canon even make a none L f2.8 70-200mm?
non IS version
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #12  
yellowbastard's Avatar
yellowbastard
Bootyologist (__i__)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,300
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
:yay:

My new lens will be here on Monday

70-200mm f2.8 Canon L glass
Now I will have to eat ramen for a week because this is setting me back a hairh:

You baller you. I'm still contemplating a nice wide angle for my 300d.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #13  
umop-apisdn's Avatar
umop-apisdn
Allergic to vitamin D
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,032
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Default

NS doesn't like me in his threads Thing is, if he'd ask me to stay out I probably would. He's just being passive by deleting my posts like I won't notice.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #14  
Im@ge's Avatar
Im@ge
So ugly it hurts..See?
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,912
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Why dammit?
cause you gotta eat those damn Ramen noodles :rant:
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #15  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by yellowbastard
You baller you. I'm still contemplating a nice wide angle for my 300d.
Try the sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4.0
Its affordable and I personally use one and have been more than happy with it. I do wish it was a bit faster at 35mm but its not anything you can't learn to work around. For the price its an excellent lens and I have no plans of replacing it unless I find one down the road that is faster than it is.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #16  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by umop-apisdn
NS doesn't like me in his threads Thing is, if he'd ask me to stay out I probably would. He's just being passive by deleting my posts like I won't notice.
I don't find you someone I am particularly fond of because you feel the need to always post stupid shit in my thread. So when I see you do that just expect I will delete that post because it annoys me and it adds nothing to the content of the topic.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #17  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
I have no plans of replacing it unless I find one down the road that is faster than it is.
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/len...85&navigator=6

Thank me later.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #18  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
I have actually checked that one and it is nice but it does have some minor color shift issues according to some I know who have purchased it
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #19  
yellowbastard's Avatar
yellowbastard
Bootyologist (__i__)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,300
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Try the sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4.0
Its affordable and I personally use one and have been more than happy with it. I do wish it was a bit faster at 35mm but its not anything you can't learn to work around. For the price its an excellent lens and I have no plans of replacing it unless I find one down the road that is faster than it is.

Actually I was looking at the Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX Super Wide Angle. The 17-35mm looks about $110 cheaper, maybe I'll have to consider that one too.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #20  
DakarM's Avatar
DakarM
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Default

Originally Posted by yellowbastard
Actually I was looking at the Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX Super Wide Angle. The 17-35mm looks about $110 cheaper, maybe I'll have to consider that one too.

just get a 16mm f2.8 h:
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 AM.