How's this for a research paper topic?
I have to write a 10-20 page paper for my War and World Politics class. Here is my topic proposal:
"The preliminary topic I have chosen for my research paper will focus on the United States' maneuver strategy in both Vietnam and the first Gulf War. I will investigate into a few possible sources/reasons why this strategy failed in Vietnam, but worked in the Gulf War - where both enemy states are not as militarily advanced as the US. I will try and conclude with what the crucial factor between the two was."
Hopefully I can find enough information on the Gulf War since history hasn't caught up to that point yet.
"The preliminary topic I have chosen for my research paper will focus on the United States' maneuver strategy in both Vietnam and the first Gulf War. I will investigate into a few possible sources/reasons why this strategy failed in Vietnam, but worked in the Gulf War - where both enemy states are not as militarily advanced as the US. I will try and conclude with what the crucial factor between the two was."
Hopefully I can find enough information on the Gulf War since history hasn't caught up to that point yet.

just as long as you write about something you're familiar with, you're good to go. those pages will fly by.
i had to write a paper on ethics last year ... people went with the usual Enron, Arthur Andersen, Tyco crap ... i went with piracy in China. Clothing, entertainment, medicine ... my favorite paper ever.
seems a little apples/oranges to me. p'haps you could hone it down to a specific aspect of strategy or politics? The more narrow-focused the better your paper will turn out. Also, do you/your library have access to JSTOR? If so, that resource will prove invaluable in your research.
Originally Posted by white_n_slow
seems a little apples/oranges to me. p'haps you could hone it down to a specific aspect of strategy or politics? The more narrow-focused the better your paper will turn out. Also, do you/your library have access to JSTOR? If so, that resource will prove invaluable in your research.
Before the first Gulf War, it's interesting to note that Iraq had one of the largest standing armies in the world... Air superiority and a unified practiced strategy of quick supression were what won that war. Vietnam was, I would think as a layperson, a poor comparison because it was basically an escallating and poorly-managed "police action", without any of the practiced theories in GWI. I would think that the Korean War and GWI are more similar in that respect (And thus more fitting for such a comparison in outcomes)...
Originally Posted by Epoch
Before the first Gulf War, it's interesting to note that Iraq had one of the largest standing armies in the world... Air superiority and a unified practiced strategy of quick supression were what won that war. Vietnam was, I would think as a layperson, a poor comparison because it was basically an escallating and poorly-managed "police action", without any of the practiced theories in GWI. I would think that the Korean War and GWI are more similar in that respect (And thus more fitting for such a comparison in outcomes)...
and you asking to elaborate....i have to research it to find the crucial factor


