Honda-Acura.net

Honda-Acura.net (https://www.honda-acura.net/forums/index.php)
-   The Basement (https://www.honda-acura.net/forums/the-basement-2/)
-   -   How's this for a research paper topic? (https://www.honda-acura.net/forums/the-basement/182911-hows-this-for-a-research-paper-topic.html)

LT Mar 31, 2005 08:15 PM

How's this for a research paper topic?
 
I have to write a 10-20 page paper for my War and World Politics class. Here is my topic proposal:

"The preliminary topic I have chosen for my research paper will focus on the United States' maneuver strategy in both Vietnam and the first Gulf War. I will investigate into a few possible sources/reasons why this strategy failed in Vietnam, but worked in the Gulf War - where both enemy states are not as militarily advanced as the US. I will try and conclude with what the crucial factor between the two was."

Hopefully I can find enough information on the Gulf War since history hasn't caught up to that point yet.

89civicSiR Mar 31, 2005 08:41 PM

sounds like an a to me:rolleyes:

LT Mar 31, 2005 08:45 PM

don't be jealous that i was chatting with babes online all day

BonzoAPD Apr 1, 2005 05:06 AM

LT I'd love to read it when you're done

e3NiNe Apr 1, 2005 05:13 AM

:cool:

just as long as you write about something you're familiar with, you're good to go. those pages will fly by.

i had to write a paper on ethics last year ... people went with the usual Enron, Arthur Andersen, Tyco crap ... i went with piracy in China. Clothing, entertainment, medicine ... my favorite paper ever. :)

white_n_slow Apr 1, 2005 07:06 AM

seems a little apples/oranges to me. p'haps you could hone it down to a specific aspect of strategy or politics? The more narrow-focused the better your paper will turn out. Also, do you/your library have access to JSTOR? If so, that resource will prove invaluable in your research.

LT Apr 1, 2005 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by white_n_slow
seems a little apples/oranges to me. p'haps you could hone it down to a specific aspect of strategy or politics? The more narrow-focused the better your paper will turn out. Also, do you/your library have access to JSTOR? If so, that resource will prove invaluable in your research.

it is as narrow as possible because i conclude with what CRUCIAL FACTOR between the two resulted in their outcomes.

white_n_slow Apr 1, 2005 10:14 AM


Originally Posted by LT6916
it is as narrow as possible because i conclude with what CRUCIAL FACTOR between the two resulted in their outcomes.

elaborate please :happysad:

Epoch Apr 1, 2005 10:23 AM

Before the first Gulf War, it's interesting to note that Iraq had one of the largest standing armies in the world... Air superiority and a unified practiced strategy of quick supression were what won that war. Vietnam was, I would think as a layperson, a poor comparison because it was basically an escallating and poorly-managed "police action", without any of the practiced theories in GWI. I would think that the Korean War and GWI are more similar in that respect (And thus more fitting for such a comparison in outcomes)...

LT Apr 1, 2005 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by Epoch
Before the first Gulf War, it's interesting to note that Iraq had one of the largest standing armies in the world... Air superiority and a unified practiced strategy of quick supression were what won that war. Vietnam was, I would think as a layperson, a poor comparison because it was basically an escallating and poorly-managed "police action", without any of the practiced theories in GWI. I would think that the Korean War and GWI are more similar in that respect (And thus more fitting for such a comparison in outcomes)...

there was no "war" per se in Korea. and we didn't use a manuever strategy in the korean war...it was more of attrition.

and you asking to elaborate....i have to research it to find the crucial factor :p


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands