Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

just regular wrx or SRT-4

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #41  
AP2's Avatar
AP2
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,789
Likes: 1
Default

Neither for me but I guess I'd get the WRX so I can go sling mud
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #42  
Tinker Bell's Avatar
Tinker Bell
mexikin who?
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,267
Likes: 0
From: mazatlan, Sinaloa MeksIK0
Default

srt-4 simply because its underrated

wrx =overrated

h:
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 04:23 PM
  #43  
aux's Avatar
aux
More Black on Black Crime
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 37,776
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

wrx because the srt is fugly. yup i said it.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #44  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ISP James
this i would never doubt however im not sure that fear of quality wouldnt affect my decisions.

my parents had a dodge caravan for 200000 driven miles, my dads dakota has 180k.... i dont question the quality of dodge vehicles.

and the fact that 90 bajillion people have wrx's would be a turnoff if i was gonna buy one or the either.
I dunno, my parents' Grand Voyager has had it's engine rebuilt, transmission replaced, engine computer replaced, and ABS brake controller and master cylinder replaced, and it has only about 130000 miles. And it's interior and exterior has degraded more than my dad's 88 accord. So call me a little biased, but I'm not exactly a fan of Chrysler build quality.

Originally Posted by ISP James
maybe you can confirm or deny this. ive been told that while driving the WRX, when you shift into 2/4 your elbow hits the seat bolstering. ive heard that gets to be a pain in the ass. i also heard some complain about the armrest but having never driven one i cant make the call myself.
I drove an 04 a couple months ago, and I don't recall having this problem. and I'm 6'.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #45  
spanky's Avatar
spanky
I go duffy on dem bitches
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 28,248
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideAccord
wrx has more potential.. SRT-4 is still a neon with a bigger wing
srt has ALOT of potential




id pick the wrx :chuckles:
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #46  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

well, as I've already said, and as the gist of this thread seems to go, the srt-4 may be faster, but the wrx is simply a more desireable final product to most. I'd choose the wrx, and even moreso if I could get a wagon... utility in a decently fast car with potential is the ultimate combination.

Now if they made a srt-4 wagon... well, I can't imagine that looking half-way decent, so I dunno. If they ever make an awd or rwd neon, I'll be awefully tempted.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #47  
dE.fUsEd's Avatar
dE.fUsEd
I still like honda's. :-/
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 16,762
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default



prolly the srt.

i'm just tired of seeing wrx's. and i think the older body stlye (headlights, front end, and such) looked waaaaaay secksier.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #48  
supapoopa's Avatar
supapoopa
Nissan: Shift_Recall
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

WRX wagon.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 01:13 AM
  #49  
TeHJuSTiN's Avatar
TeHJuSTiN
NAM #0001
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

STi>SRT>regWRX
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 01:16 AM
  #50  
dE.fUsEd's Avatar
dE.fUsEd
I still like honda's. :-/
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 16,762
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by TeHJuSTiN
STi>SRT>regWRX
buttt..

22k<30k
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.