just regular wrx or SRT-4
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
srt-4
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:39 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
id take the SRT-4 for the "everybody doesnt at least know somebody with one" factor.
wrx is played.
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:41 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISP James
id take the SRT-4 for the "everybody doesnt at least know somebody with one" factor.
wrx is played.
there is usually a good reason why lots of people own something...
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:50 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,377
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Quote:
Originally Posted by white_n_slow
I've driven both. The neon is considerably faster, but I'd still take the subaru.
Better overall quality + awd - not as fast > cheap + fast - worse overall quality - poor traction
:stupid:
here is some text,
and hawtpants did not put any text in his post, so clablamo.
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:50 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,177
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
wrx has more potential.. SRT-4 is still a neon with a bigger wing
Dec 22, 2004 | 10:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Bottomline:
wrx - 829587 gajillion, neon - 1
Dec 22, 2004 | 11:02 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
From: El Monte, CA
Dec 22, 2004 | 11:03 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by b16LeiaEGcivic
there is usually a good reason why lots of people own something...
this i would never doubt however im not sure that fear of quality wouldnt affect my decisions.
my parents had a dodge caravan for 200000 driven miles, my dads dakota has 180k.... i dont question the quality of dodge vehicles.
and the fact that 90 bajillion people have wrx's would be a turnoff if i was gonna buy one or the either.