13yr. old shows too much :naughty:
Originally Posted by axemansean
Sadly todays parents have no say in what their kids can and can't do. Most kids will force their parents to do something or threaten them with legal action. Back when I was a kid if I dared do something wrong I was reprimanded and I took it like a man because I knew I had screwed up. Today kids think they are right and everyone else is wrong.
again that all starts with parenting. many kids today are spoiled brats, due parents giving them everything they want when they are little. when the kid cries it's give them what they want to shut them up. i do think TV/ Movies do tend to send the wrong message sometimes to kids, but it's still a parents job to set the kid straight. your right the whole not spanking your kid thing when they are bad i think is part of the problem too.
Originally Posted by LiLRexen
The point is that she is not an adult and it's the parent's responsibility to regulate what she wears. 26 was a random number chosen to convey "adult", not a psycho need to control his child well into functioning adulthood. So :slap: right back at ya.
And how did the mom decide that a long purple dress with a scoop neck looks like a shorter pink dress with a crossover neckline? The only similarity I see is that they are both too tight and sleeveless.
And how did the mom decide that a long purple dress with a scoop neck looks like a shorter pink dress with a crossover neckline? The only similarity I see is that they are both too tight and sleeveless.
Originally Posted by AccordSleeper
again that all starts with parenting. many kids today are spoiled brats, due parents giving them everything they want when they are little. when the kid cries it's give them what they want to shut them up. i do think TV/ Movies do tend to send the wrong message sometimes to kids, but it's still a parents job to set the kid straight. your right the whole not spanking your kid thing when they are bad i think is part of the problem too.
Originally Posted by LiLRexen
never allowed to even wear sleeveless, much less let my tits hang out so 20 year old guys would say "dayem, i'd hit that fo sho!"
h:
Originally Posted by 9600baud
buncha f*cktards... you cant see anything, let her wear whatever the f*ck she wants, its America you bunch of losers, so annoying 

Originally Posted by 9600baud
buncha f*cktards... you cant see anything, let her wear whatever the f*ck she wants, its America you bunch of losers, so annoying 


1. it's a catholic school.
2. it was made clear what she was not allowed to wear.
3. she's THIRTEEN YEARS OLD!
why are you so against people abiding by rules and the law? do you really want an anarchist nation?
Originally Posted by AccordSleeper
although i feel people like britney and how about that 17yr old lindsey lohan are part of the problem, however someone has to buy a 13yr old girl her clothes. responsibilty relies with the parents, but i do feel that underage celebs should dress more apporiate for their fan base.
very true, and in this case the mother bought the dress. I don't think the dress was that bad but it did go against the written rules. That being said the mother was wrong.
Originally Posted by axemansean
Sadly todays parents have no say in what their kids can and can't do. Most kids will force their parents to do something or threaten them with legal action. Back when I was a kid if I dared do something wrong I was reprimanded and I took it like a man because I knew I had screwed up. Today kids think they are right and everyone else is wrong.
Originally Posted by LiLRexen
The point is that she is not an adult and it's the parent's responsibility to regulate what she wears. 26 was a random number chosen to convey "adult", not a psycho need to control his child well into functioning adulthood. So :slap: right back at ya.
And how did the mom decide that a long purple dress with a scoop neck looks like a shorter pink dress with a crossover neckline? The only similarity I see is that they are both too tight and sleeveless.
And how did the mom decide that a long purple dress with a scoop neck looks like a shorter pink dress with a crossover neckline? The only similarity I see is that they are both too tight and sleeveless.
Originally Posted by 9600baud
Regulate? yea of course, we dont want them going into drugs etc... but c'mon, a dress? Thats way too overboard.

Originally Posted by reno96teg
oh boy.. 
1. it's a catholic school.
2. it was made clear what she was not allowed to wear.
3. she's THIRTEEN YEARS OLD!
why are you so against people abiding by rules and the law? do you really want an anarchist nation?

1. it's a catholic school.
2. it was made clear what she was not allowed to wear.
3. she's THIRTEEN YEARS OLD!
why are you so against people abiding by rules and the law? do you really want an anarchist nation?
:werd: Reno so true. WTF is with these noobs and their hate of rules and laws?
Originally Posted by BonzoAPD
Yeah that dress was not similar at all. Totally different neckline.
It was the rule. She broke it. End of story. Though looking your comment in the thread about cops you have no sense of rules and laws
:werd: Reno so true. WTF is with these noobs and their hate of rules and laws?
It was the rule. She broke it. End of story. Though looking your comment in the thread about cops you have no sense of rules and laws

:werd: Reno so true. WTF is with these noobs and their hate of rules and laws?
Whats with you e-thugs with blinders on that cant see that sometimes rules are stupid and pointless? They are going to make it (maybe already is) a law where if you wear baggy pants you get a $175 ticket. Its a rule! so it must be good right? Okay... but whatever... to each his own.


