Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Sentra SE-R Spec V (Opinions)

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
Buddah's Avatar
Buddah
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach
Default Sentra SE-R Spec V (Opinions)

I have been looking at this used spec V Sentra (2002) for sale for awhile now, I checked out the interior and stuff, and it seems pretty nice, way better than what Im driving now (96 Dx, with some minor things done.)

What do you guys think about the Spec V Sentra, any of you have any time inside/driving one etc?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
More&Faster's Avatar
More&Faster
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

never driven one, but IMO its a waste of money. its a good car, dont get me wrong. just a waste of money

whats your budget on this?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
S2Kev's Avatar
S2Kev
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,019
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Get an early 90's sentra se-r. I have heard very good things about it.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #4  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

Originally posted by e30dood
Get an early 90's sentra se-r. I have heard very good things about it.
:werd: The 2.5 I-4 in the current SE-R is um, not exactly refined. It's too big to be a 4-cylinder, especially without balance shafts. Plus the car itself, while it looks nice, really ain't that nice to drive.

If you're hell bent on getting an SE-R, get an early 90's with high miles. Order a blacktop SR20DET. Eat Honda.

But that's just me, and I know nothing.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
FourthGenHatch's Avatar
FourthGenHatch
I'm RICK JAMES, bitch!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

I think the SE-Rs look nice as hell. The 2002-2003 I think are the older ones, than the 2004 has the ugly ass nose thing in the grill which makes the whole car look like shit. The interior is very nice. I hear the engine ain't that great and its sort of slow. But still a setup up from a Civic DX if the price is right.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 10:11 PM
  #6  
Black2KGSR's Avatar
Black2KGSR
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 21,463
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

:bowdown: SR20
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
cvc2k's Avatar
cvc2k
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

A friend of mine got one... No fold-down feature for rear seats apparently :-p He foudn out after he took the car home.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 03:38 AM
  #8  
brtecson's Avatar
brtecson
pukimonster
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

as a b13-nut, my opinion is prolly biased. but i am unsatisfied with the spec-v. the se-r's over the years went from enthusiast cars to sissy boy-racer cars.

they are known to have all sorts of relliabilty probs, too. the biggest complaint is the shitty transmission.

they do have some gusto in them, even though they dont put out 175 hp. it didnt handle at all like i thought it would. i wasnt feeling the interior either. the driver seap was comfy, but the interior looked too boogie/cheesy. it does have a nice sound system tho..
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 04:55 AM
  #9  
Doc Gyneco's Avatar
Doc Gyneco
Irreversible
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Default

torque steer =(

I've been complaining about lack of torque in my GS-R... but really...

Horsepower > Torque
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 05:35 AM
  #10  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Torque is a measure of force, horsepower is a measure of work that force does. They are not mutually exclusive.

(lb/ft * rpm) / 5250 = hp
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 PM.