Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

SRT-4 review in the Washington Post

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
DelSolSIinMD's Avatar
DelSolSIinMD
Thread Starter
Le Grand Illusion
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Damascus, MD
Default SRT-4 review in the Washington Post

Here's a link to Warren Brown, the Washington Post's car reviewer, giving his take on the Neon SRT-4:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Oct10.html

And here is the text:

"Horses for the Coarse

By Warren Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 12, 2003; Page G01

The 2004 Dodge Neon SRT-4 sedan is a talented kid from the wrong side of the tracks. It runs and handles better than many costlier sports cars. But what it has in driving competence, it lacks in class.


That is a good and bad thing.

The SRT-4's mission is to provide maximum performance -- speed, gear transitions and handling -- at a minimum price. With a turbocharged, 230-horsepower four-cylinder engine stuffed inside of a body weighing 2,900 pounds -- all of it at a base price below $21,000 -- it does that and more.

But if you're looking for sophistication, look elsewhere. This is a rolled-sleeve, weekend hell-raising, track-running kind of a car.

The SRT-4's only concessions to urbanity are its wonderfully bolstered front seats. The side bolsters are high enough to keep very big adult bodies in place in quick turns -- assuming those bodies are properly belted.

The people for whom the SRT-4 is built are performance hedonists. They eschew fancy interior trim in pursuit of the slightest gain in miles per hour, the smallest advantage in handling.

DaimlerChrysler Corp.'s Chrysler Group Performance Vehicle Operations, which produces the SRT-4, knows this. So do the people at Nissan Motor Co., who make the 175-horsepower SE-R Spec V; the folks at Subaru, who turn out the incredibly fast, 300-hp Subaru Impreza WRX STi; and the people at Mitsubishi, who developed the 271-hp Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution.

Those little cars are aimed at the fast and furious crowd -- people who delight in buying relatively cheap runners and beating the heck out of substantially more expensive, certainly more prestigious European models.

There is a seductive giddiness to all this -- and it can entrap you regardless of your age, sex or station.

You are sitting at a red light in your electric-blue SRT-4 minding your own business. Your engine is idling, sending partially burned fuel through the exhaust system, where it completes combustion in pop-pop, gurgle-roar noises reminiscent of sounds from NASCAR and Grand Prix race cars.

Still, you're being quite sanguine, innocent, although everything about the SRT-4 -- from its scooped hood to its flying rear spoiler -- shouts a desire to run. Then some twerp in a Porsche Boxster pulls up next to you with body language that says he's richer, he's better and he's going to put you in your place.

So, when the light turns green, you pop the SRT-4 into first gear, for which it has little tolerance, and then quickly drop it into second and spank the Boxster boy's butt.

Yes, I know. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Please forgive me, for I have sinned. But what do you expect?

I was reared with affection for the underdog, the improbable victor. The front-wheel-drive SRT-4, with its Wal-Mart interior and fire-breathing performance -- 0 to 60 miles per hour in 5.6 seconds, and lots and lots of torque -- speaks to my cultural bias.

I just couldn't help myself. "

Any opinions?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #2  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

Well, the review seemed to pretty much nail what that car is about.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #3  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

thats basically what I expect from any review of the srt-4.

"wal-mart interior" :chuckles:
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:36 PM
  #4  
hollaboyz's Avatar
hollaboyz
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Default

people dont buy the SRT-4 for class. just like how people dont buy a lotus elise for luxury features

the car does something, and it does it rather well

id take one for a daily driver, no second thoughts
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #5  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally posted by hollaboyz

id take one for a daily driver, no second thoughts
see, I see it the opposite way. I'd take an srt-4 with some go fast mods for my weekend fun car, and something more refined to drive around during the week.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:39 PM
  #6  
04 Acura TSX's Avatar
04 Acura TSX
DOHC iVTEC Power!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by RB
thats basically what I expect from any review of the srt-4.

"wal-mart interior" :chuckles:
The Lancer EVO's interior is of similar quality.h:

I wouldn't mind having an SRT-4
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 PM.