Good job kaz.

I'm gonna have to go with the Murano here...it is a looker in person. The front is so so, but the back is beautiful. I do like this design. Close second is the Audi...I'd have to drive them both. I really like the Nissan though.

 

This is interesting that these crossover SUVs are being outvoted by wagons so far.

 

I'm gonna not consider the AWD sport/touring wagons in comparison to an SUV even if it is a unibody construction "crossover" vehicle. So, I pick the Volvo XC70 because of its cool adjustable ride height air suspension.

 

The Murano looks better and better everyday. I am trying to get Moms to trade in that POS Amigo ang get something else. the Amigo does have dual removable sunroofs though. I can see the Murano, Pilot, and Highlander going head to head on comparison test.

 

Amigo, h: . Trade it in. And dont bother looking at the Highlander.

Anyways, you need an SUV? I think 30k would be better spent on a G35 or something.

 

Due to the small cargo area, funky grille, and cheap altima like interior materials I stick with the Pilot. The murano would be my second choice from this group of overpriced junk, soccer mommobiles, and of course lesbian cruisers.
The Pathfinder LE 4wd is still my favorite SUV.

 

The interior looks like a step up from the gawd-awful Altima and so-so 350Z. But still needs work.

The SUV looks great, but too bad it's going downhill by the time you lay eyes on everything forward of the A-pillar.

It will sell very well. Car-based SUV's are all the rage these days (which makes me ask why not just buy a wagon?).

 

Something about the taillamps on the exagerated fenders in the rear reminds me very much of PT Cruiser.

 

Becuase wagons are not cool, and SUV's are. (common way of thinking)