Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.

Luxury Comparison Tests by Car and Driver

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

C&D is just being C&D.

they are writing that from a performance perspective, not by a value or a consumer perspective.

another thing is that the lexus will most likely be the most dependable vehicle on that list.

now i'm not saying that it deserves to be number one, it's just that C&D doesnt stand for "car and old guys who have alot of pension money to spend on a boat of a car"
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #12  
lexusis350's Avatar
lexusis350
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Troopa-R
Yes.

1. About the LS460 not being comfortable: "A comfortable ride, a quiet and scrupulously climate-controlled atmosphere, multiadjustable seating with Peltier cooling pads, and video entertainment with one of the best car stereos ever devised are at your disposal."

2. About wind noise (is English not your first language?): "sound levels are low enough inside that imperfect door seals on our preproduction vehicle produced wind noise that seemed hurricane-like in comparison."

That pretty much means the car is so quiet that some pre-production imperfections show up so readily. The fact that this car is pre-production (read: hand built) means that it's not reflective of production quality. They tend to be lower.
I never knew the preproduction model was hand built. Nice Fact
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #13  
GhettoMax's Avatar
GhettoMax
My other car is also slow
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Tri-Cities, WA
Default

Originally Posted by lexusis350



Third Place: 2006 BMW 750Li

Highs: A fast driver's car that has all the moves.

Lows: Challenging ergonomics (the curse of iDrive), interior is not that elegant.

they STILL havent gotten rid of that idrive crap? atleast shouldve learnt to improve it already!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
fastball's Avatar
fastball
A little chin music
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Default

Originally Posted by GhettoMax
they STILL havent gotten rid of that idrive crap? atleast shouldve learnt to improve it already!

BMW is very pompous about anything they sell. Whether anyone likes it, it doesn't really matter to them. According to their logic, you'll buy it because it says BMW. If you don't like it, you're the incompetent fool not worthy of one of our cars.

Generally speaking, they can get away with that arrogance because their cars are that damn good. But in the case of iDrive, I'm not so sure.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #15  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

iDrive is pretty terrible. It's not so much irritating to use, it's actually pretty simple. But there's so many menus and sub menus to go through to get to the dumbest crap that it makes it impossible to use while driving.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 04:54 AM
  #16  
fathom22's Avatar
fathom22
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AF
iDrive is pretty terrible. It's not so much irritating to use, it's actually pretty simple. But there's so many menus and sub menus to go through to get to the dumbest crap that it makes it impossible to use while driving.
obviously you're not smart enough to drive a bmw then.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 05:43 AM
  #17  
totalimmortal's Avatar
totalimmortal
MalleusMaleficarum
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
Default

I've allways liked the way Jaguar's drove. I've driven several and never been let down with the ride comfort, interior fit and finish, and performance.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #18  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by fathom22
obviously you're not smart enough to drive a bmw then.
no, iDrive is retarded. bar none the dumbest thing i have ever seen.

you have to constantly look down at the controls to see where you are and still then it's an obstruction when accessing what used to be controlled by a simple knob or button.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #19  
fastball's Avatar
fastball
A little chin music
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Default

Originally Posted by AF
iDrive is pretty terrible. It's not so much irritating to use, it's actually pretty simple. But there's so many menus and sub menus to go through to get to the dumbest crap that it makes it impossible to use while driving.
The best navi/integrated vehicle operations still have basic, frequently used operations available separately. From what I've read (I've never acutally used iDrive), you have to go through an act of Congress just to adjust the radio volume or change the climate control temp.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #20  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by fastball
The best navi/integrated vehicle operations still have basic, frequently used operations available separately. From what I've read (I've never acutally used iDrive), you have to go through an act of Congress just to adjust the radio volume or change the climate control temp.
i don't even find that too disturbing, but honestly, wheres the touch screen?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.