LS TURBO vs. GSR
#131
#133
hmmmmm... after reading this thread ive came to a conclusion that it needs to be renamed to: PEOPLE WHO ARE PISSED OFF BECAUSE THEY BOUGHT AN LS AND ARE JEALOUS THEY DONT HAVE A GSR!!... all u people defending the ls need to shut the hell up u fukin babys
#134
Originally posted by hyperlite
hmmmmm... after reading this thread ive came to a conclusion that it needs to be renamed to: PEOPLE WHO ARE PISSED OFF BECAUSE THEY BOUGHT AN LS AND ARE JEALOUS THEY DONT HAVE A GSR!!... all u people defending the ls need to shut the hell up u fukin babys
hmmmmm... after reading this thread ive came to a conclusion that it needs to be renamed to: PEOPLE WHO ARE PISSED OFF BECAUSE THEY BOUGHT AN LS AND ARE JEALOUS THEY DONT HAVE A GSR!!... all u people defending the ls need to shut the hell up u fukin babys
#136
this thread reminds me of the do I/H/E make power thread. newgsrdriver and i started a while back.
you n00bs won't remember h:
you n00bs won't remember h:
#137
lol ls turbo better then a gsr turbo..heh now ive heard it all. If i had bought an ls instead of a gsr, i would be sad, gsr puts 40 more HP to the wheels if im not mistaken, i have killed so many ls integras, nothing special about them at all. I like the cars, dont get me wrong, they look nice as hell, just like the gsr tho as well. I have raced 3 different ls vtec's with i/e/h, most also had differet gearing, and some internals done on them, and i have yet to lose to one, and im bone stock, cept for my high flow and catback
#138
Originally posted by Bumnah
gsr turbo > ls turbo
no if's and's or but's about it.
more compression means more hp out of every pound of boost. let's not factor in the longer power band.
gsr turbo > ls turbo
no if's and's or but's about it.
more compression means more hp out of every pound of boost. let's not factor in the longer power band.
#139
Originally posted by sCribes
lol ls turbo better then a gsr turbo..heh now ive heard it all. If i had bought an ls instead of a gsr, i would be sad, gsr puts 40 more HP to the wheels if im not mistaken, i have killed so many ls integras, nothing special about them at all. I like the cars, dont get me wrong, they look nice as hell, just like the gsr tho as well. I have raced 3 different ls vtec's with i/e/h, most also had differet gearing, and some internals done on them, and i have yet to lose to one, and im bone stock, cept for my high flow and catback
lol ls turbo better then a gsr turbo..heh now ive heard it all. If i had bought an ls instead of a gsr, i would be sad, gsr puts 40 more HP to the wheels if im not mistaken, i have killed so many ls integras, nothing special about them at all. I like the cars, dont get me wrong, they look nice as hell, just like the gsr tho as well. I have raced 3 different ls vtec's with i/e/h, most also had differet gearing, and some internals done on them, and i have yet to lose to one, and im bone stock, cept for my high flow and catback
#140
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Philly & MD
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think this thread is giving some of the senior members of the board an idea about who frequents this site. The misinformation weve allowed to accumulate here is getting too thick, and people are spouting it all over the place.
Who would turbo a car without changing compression? Aye aye aye...back to square one!
And Bumnah, I remember that thread....you were owned brotha
Who would turbo a car without changing compression? Aye aye aye...back to square one!
And Bumnah, I remember that thread....you were owned brotha