Blue Interior lighting
Originally posted by DB7 2.0
what camera did you use and at what setting to take those pics?
h:
damn, nice work btw :thumbup:
what camera did you use and at what setting to take those pics?
h:damn, nice work btw :thumbup:
i have a shitty kodak dx3900
(DONT GET A KODAK)
actually they take decent pictures but i coulda gotten a canon or somethin

anyway for pics of light i always turn the exposure compensation down, ISO speed to 400, and make sure u have something to hold the camera still such as a tripod or just hold it against something so u dont move it when the pic is being taken..
Originally posted by ludatic
i have a shitty kodak dx3900
(DONT GET A KODAK)
actually they take decent pictures but i coulda gotten a canon or somethin
anyway for pics of light i always turn the exposure compensation down, ISO speed to 400, and make sure u have something to hold the camera still such as a tripod or just hold it against something so u dont move it when the pic is being taken..
i have a shitty kodak dx3900
(DONT GET A KODAK)
actually they take decent pictures but i coulda gotten a canon or somethin

anyway for pics of light i always turn the exposure compensation down, ISO speed to 400, and make sure u have something to hold the camera still such as a tripod or just hold it against something so u dont move it when the pic is being taken..
and yeah, i havent tried taking pics inside my car with a digicam yet just asking cuz the lighting on those pics actually came out pretty clear
Originally posted by DB7 2.0
werd...my friend has a kodak camera as well, but its a 4mp...pretty nice quality.
and yeah, i havent tried taking pics inside my car with a digicam yet just asking cuz the lighting on those pics actually came out pretty clear
werd...my friend has a kodak camera as well, but its a 4mp...pretty nice quality.
and yeah, i havent tried taking pics inside my car with a digicam yet just asking cuz the lighting on those pics actually came out pretty clear
i think my camera was decent at the time.. it's 3.1 megapixels but i regret getting it for multiple reasons...
1 it's too much for "beginners"... it's too much of a point-and-shoot
2 can't record video
there's others but those are the main ones that bug me
someone help me decide my interior is freaken tan so i dunno blah! *oh and i'll have the money by next weekend i.e most likely friday cause i got spring break and i'm going to work all weekend* [edit]
Originally posted by ludatic
Yea, Kodak's known for making FILM, not cameras..
i think my camera was decent at the time.. it's 3.1 megapixels but i regret getting it for multiple reasons...
1 it's too much for "beginners"... it's too much of a point-and-shoot
2 can't record video
there's others but those are the main ones that bug me
Yea, Kodak's known for making FILM, not cameras..
i think my camera was decent at the time.. it's 3.1 megapixels but i regret getting it for multiple reasons...
1 it's too much for "beginners"... it's too much of a point-and-shoot
2 can't record video
there's others but those are the main ones that bug me
best bang for the buck in my opinion.anyway, i need an amber climate control and my interior will be done
h:
Originally posted by DB7 2.0
anyway, i need an amber climate control and my interior will be done
h:
anyway, i need an amber climate control and my interior will be done
h:
__________________
DB Squad
Integra Forum Moderator
2016 BMW 340i M-Sport / 2013 Chevrolet Volt / 1999 Subaru Impreza RS EJ205
DB Squad
Integra Forum Moderator
2016 BMW 340i M-Sport / 2013 Chevrolet Volt / 1999 Subaru Impreza RS EJ205



it's for the new civics.