Notices

Mazda3 or RSX, which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
maldini's Avatar
maldini
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default Mazda3 or RSX, which is better?

Mazda3 or RSX, which car would you buy?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #2  
ProjectRSX's Avatar
ProjectRSX
User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

The mazda 3 is way over priced, with all options its as much as an rsx. Now compare the brands, which is more reliable, which has better looks, etc. I think the Mazda is fugly, and for 20+ g's its not worth it.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
honda_pilot's Avatar
honda_pilot
DeeCeeFo'
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,755
Likes: 0
From: Scranton PA
Default

Originally Posted by ProjectRSX
The mazda 3 is way over priced, with all options its as much as an rsx. Now compare the brands, which is more reliable, which has better looks, etc. I think the Mazda is fugly, and for 20+ g's its not worth it.

They are in different classes of vehicles. One a coupe, the other a 4-door sedan. One has "sports-coupe" dynamics the other "sports-sedan" dynamics. The Mazda 3 is by no means ugly. But taste varies from person to person so thats not the issue. Mazda has HID's,more room, and yes Mazda does have reliability. Althought its a Ford basically at the same time remember its also a Volvo.

$20K for the fully-loaded 3 is only very very slightly overpriced IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
maldini's Avatar
maldini
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

In fact, Mazda 3's engine is designed by Mazda and used by Ford.
Mazda 3's chassis is designed by Volvo, so should be very strong.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #5  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

I like both, however wouldn't care to buy either of them new. If I had to pick, I'd take an RSX.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
ProjectRSX's Avatar
ProjectRSX
User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by honda_pilot
They are in different classes of vehicles. One a coupe, the other a 4-door sedan. One has "sports-coupe" dynamics the other "sports-sedan" dynamics. The Mazda 3 is by no means ugly. But taste varies from person to person so thats not the issue. Mazda has HID's,more room, and yes Mazda does have reliability. Althought its a Ford basically at the same time remember its also a Volvo.

$20K for the fully-loaded 3 is only very very slightly overpriced IMO.

You do make a good point, they are two totaly different cars. When i was at the toyota/mazda dealer (before i bought the rsx-s i was looking at all my options) the mazda 3 was up there in price i want to say 22 or 23 for the fully loaded everything possible model, to me thats pricy for that car. But like you said considering the 2 to 4 doors, etc. it would realy depend on what you were looking for in a car.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #7  
maldini's Avatar
maldini
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

The RSX costs about $2300 more than the Mazda3.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:13 PM
  #8  
airon's Avatar
airon
AARONNOJIMA.COM
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,559
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove, Ca AOL/AI
Default

are you speaking about the base rsx or type s as well?
they are different imo and are different cars in terms of what market they are trying to hit
the mazda3 looks decent, but doesnt have the power or the luxury of the rsx
the interior plastic is very cheapish looking and the whole car seemed to be made with cost in mind (thats why its so cheap)

i personally ended up with a rsx-s while my best friend went with the mazda3 4 door. but then we have different needs and ideas on what we wanted
__________________
"Dreaming is how the strong survive....."
"Am I dying to live, or living to die?"
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by airon
the interior plastic is very cheapish looking and the whole car seemed to be made with cost in mind (thats why its so cheap)
Are you talking about the RSX or the 3? Both interiors looked compairable in quality to me.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
mikeyr0th's Avatar
mikeyr0th
Part-time Hill Billy
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern PA
Default

I'd personally go with the RSX. Much more potential, plus it looks oh so sexy. That's probably the reason why I chose the Type S over the SRT-4, it might lack the power that the 4 has, but the interior doesn't look like it's been made by Rubbermaid, and plus neons are just fugly anyways. Plus, Acura has excellent resale/reliability, and their parts are great.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 AM.