Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

supercharger Vs. Turbocharger

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:23 PM
  #1  
jake1511's Avatar
jake1511
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default supercharger Vs. Turbocharger

just wondering what the most popular choice was.

heres a page on the pros and cons(wondering if they actually know much about turbo's)
http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?ID=19

i was wondering if i could get your choice on a supercharger or turbo charger.
since you guys (and girls) are seasoned mechanics and drivers, which would you prefer and why?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:37 PM
  #2  
PDiggityDogg's Avatar
PDiggityDogg
Meanwhile, up in The D
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 997
Likes: 1
Default

http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=688120
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #3  
XCM828's Avatar
XCM828
stay off of wet roads
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Definetly go turbo. They are much more efficient when it comes to creating power. Superchargers run off of a belt which steals horsepower away from the engine the same way an a/c compressor does. With turbo's you can also easily adjust how much boost you are running. With a supercharger you cant adjust the boost, (other than buying different belts) and you only get maximum boost at redline. With a turbo you get however much boost you are running the same thru all the rpm's. I have also found that you can get a very good turbo for about the same price as an average supercharger.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #4  
00Accordowner's Avatar
00Accordowner
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

is there a turbo kit i can get for my 2000 accord?
and how much
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #5  
Provocateur's Avatar
Provocateur
On permanent hiatus
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
From: A forum with actual tech
Default

Turbos will almost always make more power than a supercharger on the same engine.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 01:57 AM
  #6  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by jake1511
just wondering what the most popular choice was.
When it comes to Hondas, the popular choice is turbo. Always.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
cwood1388's Avatar
cwood1388
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Columbia,sc,USA
Default

lol.... man I figured a war would have been going on on this topic......but yeah most people go the turbo route when it comes to our cars
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 08:47 AM
  #8  
RicerVtr's Avatar
RicerVtr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cwood1388
lol.... man I figured a war would have been going on on this topic......but yeah most people go the turbo route when it comes to our cars
I wouldn't just say hondas, i think turbos are better on any car. If your not going some crazy amount of boost than you can easily get a turbo that gets to full boost much faster than a supercharger and you don't lose any power like you would with the sc. I don't see why anyone would ever buy a SC over a TC.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 09:44 AM
  #9  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

SC's make sense on large displacement engines, especially factory boosted ones. SC's have a more even power distribution than a turbo. They can boost from idle, where a turbo with similar boosting capabilities will still have a noticeable lag. For a car with a larger engine (like say a V8) the amount or torque needed to drive the supercharger is a smaller fraction of the total output, so you you still gain a net increase in power. Add that a SC is less finicky, so it makes sense for car makers to use it since it is more reliable than a turbo.

Case in point, the Mustang Cobra is (was) factory supercharged.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #10  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
SC's make sense on large displacement engines, especially factory boosted ones. SC's have a more even power distribution than a turbo. They can boost from idle, where a turbo with similar boosting capabilities will still have a noticeable lag. For a car with a larger engine (like say a V8) the amount or torque needed to drive the supercharger is a smaller fraction of the total output, so you you still gain a net increase in power. Add that a SC is less finicky, so it makes sense for car makers to use it since it is more reliable than a turbo.

Case in point, the Mustang Cobra is (was) factory supercharged.
Centrifugal superchargers don't make boost at idle. You are thinking of a roots type blower like the Jackson Racing.
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.