GS vs. Beetle turbo
Originally posted by LudeRage
Well than it wasn't stock cuz my car is hugging mid 15s and that thing , to say the least, was not.
Well than it wasn't stock cuz my car is hugging mid 15s and that thing , to say the least, was not.
An "average" bolt-on 1.8T puts around 200-210 whp to the ground. That's with a chip, intake, and cat-back exhaust.
For this particular motor, a chip works wonders. 20 whp is a usual gain, with some reporting as much as 30. I can send you dynos.
For some reason, VW de-tunes the 1.8T to keep it under VR6 performance. They apparently want the VR6 to be their "top of the line" engine. Strangely enough, a new 1.8 can DYNO near 170, although the crank is reported as 180.
Originally posted by senseiturtle
An "average" bolt-on 1.8T puts around 200-210 whp to the ground. That's with a chip, intake, and cat-back exhaust.
For this particular motor, a chip works wonders. 20 whp is a usual gain, with some reporting as much as 30. I can send you dynos.
For some reason, VW de-tunes the 1.8T to keep it under VR6 performance. They apparently want the VR6 to be their "top of the line" engine. Strangely enough, a new 1.8 can DYNO near 170, although the crank is reported as 180.
An "average" bolt-on 1.8T puts around 200-210 whp to the ground. That's with a chip, intake, and cat-back exhaust.
For this particular motor, a chip works wonders. 20 whp is a usual gain, with some reporting as much as 30. I can send you dynos.
For some reason, VW de-tunes the 1.8T to keep it under VR6 performance. They apparently want the VR6 to be their "top of the line" engine. Strangely enough, a new 1.8 can DYNO near 170, although the crank is reported as 180.
he used to beat me by a whole lot on the highway, when i just had bolt-ons and stuff, and my car was probably about as fast as a gs.
Originally posted by PikkaGTR
fast and bug somehow don't seem to go toghether......
but so does fast and GS
hehehe j\p
fast and bug somehow don't seem to go toghether......
but so does fast and GS
hehehe j\p


