Notices

Why not an H22A?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-28-2005, 04:51 PM
  #1  
cvchtchbck92
Anti-Ebayer
Thread Starter
 
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why not an H22A?

Hi. This is my first post but I have been contemplating whether what type of engine I should get for my 92 Honda Civic CX Hatchback. I have been researching what engines I can and cannot get but the majority of people get a B16 or B18 Type R engine. So here is where my dilemma occurs, why don't people get a H22A engine. It's just as fast (200hp) if not faster and in some cases, its cheaper $$.
Old 10-28-2005, 05:07 PM
  #2  
FLAT_LINER
Ridin Dirty
 
FLAT_LINER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Search
Old 10-28-2005, 07:31 PM
  #3  
Pete
Civilian
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami Beach. FL
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
Old 10-29-2005, 01:30 PM
  #4  
cvchtchbck92
Anti-Ebayer
Thread Starter
 
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
I read that it really all comes down to only a mere 25 lbs. more. ( http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=684550 ). But I have heard of the electrical issues and the amount of space it takes up. Thanks.
Old 10-29-2005, 01:52 PM
  #5  
daveb91
Boo Boo Kitty F*#k
 
daveb91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vienna WV
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is for PRE 92s
Old 10-29-2005, 01:56 PM
  #6  
RedlineBoyzCRX
EG6
 
RedlineBoyzCRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
My friends did this exact same swap, and he had to get Hella strong springs to support the weight of it all. his steering is hell too. B Series is cheaper to swap too.
Old 10-29-2005, 06:57 PM
  #7  
cvchtchbck92
Anti-Ebayer
Thread Starter
 
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveb91
this is for PRE 92s
So I take it that pre 92 does not include 92. I thought it was 92 and earlier.
Old 10-30-2005, 10:36 AM
  #8  
daveb91
Boo Boo Kitty F*#k
 
daveb91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vienna WV
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pre 92 means before 92. 92 started a whole new gen.
Old 10-30-2005, 10:39 AM
  #9  
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
sherwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RedlineBoyzCRX
My friends did this exact same swap, and he had to get Hella strong springs to support the weight of it all. his steering is hell too. B Series is cheaper to swap too.
it depends on the car it's going into. if the car was originally designed for something that weighs less than a b-series then it's another 30 pounds onto that.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM.