Notices

Why not an H22A?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #1  
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
cvchtchbck92
Thread Starter
Anti-Ebayer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default Why not an H22A?

Hi. This is my first post but I have been contemplating whether what type of engine I should get for my 92 Honda Civic CX Hatchback. I have been researching what engines I can and cannot get but the majority of people get a B16 or B18 Type R engine. So here is where my dilemma occurs, why don't people get a H22A engine. It's just as fast (200hp) if not faster and in some cases, its cheaper $$.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
FLAT_LINER's Avatar
FLAT_LINER
Ridin Dirty
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
Default

Search
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 07:31 PM
  #3  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Civilian
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 1
From: Miami Beach. FL
Default

-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #4  
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
cvchtchbck92
Thread Starter
Anti-Ebayer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
I read that it really all comes down to only a mere 25 lbs. more. ( http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=684550 ). But I have heard of the electrical issues and the amount of space it takes up. Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
daveb91's Avatar
daveb91
Boo Boo Kitty F*#k
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Vienna WV
Default

this is for PRE 92s
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #6  
RedlineBoyzCRX's Avatar
RedlineBoyzCRX
EG6
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
-Too heavy in the front so your handling goes to shit. Bye Bye daily driver.
-Too big to directly swap in like the B series motors so get ready to bang your engine bay around with a sledge hammer.
-Electrical issues.
My friends did this exact same swap, and he had to get Hella strong springs to support the weight of it all. his steering is hell too. B Series is cheaper to swap too.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #7  
cvchtchbck92's Avatar
cvchtchbck92
Thread Starter
Anti-Ebayer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by daveb91
this is for PRE 92s
So I take it that pre 92 does not include 92. I thought it was 92 and earlier.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #8  
daveb91's Avatar
daveb91
Boo Boo Kitty F*#k
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Vienna WV
Default

pre 92 means before 92. 92 started a whole new gen.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #9  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by RedlineBoyzCRX
My friends did this exact same swap, and he had to get Hella strong springs to support the weight of it all. his steering is hell too. B Series is cheaper to swap too.
it depends on the car it's going into. if the car was originally designed for something that weighs less than a b-series then it's another 30 pounds onto that.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.