Notices

do ef hatches and crx's hve bad aerodynamics?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
Mackenzie C's Avatar
Mackenzie C
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default do ef hatches and crx's hve bad aerodynamics?

like in a highway race would the shape of the car slow it down?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
bluetwo's Avatar
bluetwo
Relevance is irrelevant
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Default

Yes. In a manner of speaking. All cars are drag limited even the supercars who are supposed to be good for three hundred or whatever.
That's not to say that they are areodynamically crappy, but just yeah. It's a factor.
I think lowered cars have a little less drag but don't quote me on that.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 06:31 PM
  #3  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

You'll run into drag problems around twice the legal speed limit. You don't need to be going that fast.

The coefficient of drag for the hatchbacks is right around .33.

For reference, my RX-7 comes in at ~.30 (.29 if some of the original aero parts didn't rust off,) and the Honda Insight comes in at .25. A Miata, with the top down, is around .38.

All in all, the EF body cars have decent aerodynamics.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
Exempt's Avatar
Exempt
2 tone Rex
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

I can tell u this, my old car was an E30 BMW (1984 318i)... When I would drive on the hwy on windy days, from the boxiness body of the car, I feel the car being pushed around... In my CRX, I dont have that problem at all...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #5  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kai
You'll run into drag problems around twice the legal speed limit. You don't need to be going that fast.

The coefficient of drag for the hatchbacks is right around .33.

For reference, my RX-7 comes in at ~.30 (.29 if some of the original aero parts didn't rust off,) and the Honda Insight comes in at .25. A Miata, with the top down, is around .38.

All in all, the EF body cars have decent aerodynamics.
Is the CRX better? I used to know the spec. Is it .30 for the Si and the HF is .29?

Also what exactly is the drag coefficent?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #6  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by ED9man
Is the CRX better? I used to know the spec. Is it .30 for the Si and the HF is .29?
Yes, .29 for the HF, .30 for the others.
Originally Posted by ED9man
Also what exactly is the drag coefficent?
It's a number where the smaller, the better. :chuckles:

I gave up on math and physics a couple years ago. Cd is some annoying shiz.

Here's a link:
http://www.google.com

h:
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
Mackenzie C's Avatar
Mackenzie C
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

what about the eg hatches and 5th gen vics?
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.