Notices

S2000 vs. crx question.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
Tankard's Avatar
Tankard
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Default S2000 vs. crx question.

I just had an S2000 behind me at a red light and then came around(i heard it wound out, pegged, punched, etc.), and it did not seem all that fast. And yes, he had it punched. Question being, what's this cars 1/4 mile time stock, and also with the few basic cheap mods like intake, header, exhaust? The crx with the b16a is about 13.5 seconds at 100 mph(just guessing on the mph), right? Reason i'm asking, is because i thought the S2000 was Hondas fastest car ever, other than the NSX or whatever that Acura is.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

It isn't a lot quicker than a B16a CRX with bolt ons.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #3  
kenton's Avatar
kenton
Change sig? Lose [quote]!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

The S2000 driver can't drive for shit, apparently.

Your CRX, shy of a B18C/K20* JDM swap and some nitrous, won't ever touch it.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #4  
augy's Avatar
augy
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA
Default

Originally Posted by kenton
The S2000 driver can't drive for shit, apparently.

Your CRX, shy of a B18C/K20* JDM swap and some nitrous, won't ever touch it.
Well, after a b18c and some nitro the crx will rocket by it.
A stock s2k will run only a 14.1 second quarter mile according to fast-autos.net, though it's slalom speed is a bit better at 65 mph. It's a handler, not a dragster.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 12:21 AM
  #5  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Stock S2k > your CRX.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 PM.