Notices

differences between Si and other CRX's

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 08:04 AM
  #21  
WhiteRice's Avatar
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty


ok.. i don't know if i did this "quote" thing right.. but yes, CRX's DO have moon roofs... i've seen Si's and DX's with moonroofs
HF's don't have moon roofs.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 11:59 PM
  #22  
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: san Diego, CA
Default

Originally posted by WhiteRice


HF's don't have moon roofs.


where did i say HF's have moonroofs?!?!?!? :P HF's were built to be super light and super fuel efficient... a moonroof or sunroof would weigh it down waaaay too much :P
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 05:47 AM
  #23  
WhiteRice's Avatar
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty

where did i say HF's have moonroofs?!?!?!? :P HF's were built to be super light and super fuel efficient... a moonroof or sunroof would weigh it down waaaay too much :P
You didn't, just throwing my $.02 in there, that's all....you'd mentioned Si's and Dx's had them, so I thought I'd finish the thought and say HF's didn't!!! :fawk:
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 10:05 PM
  #24  
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: san Diego, CA
Default

Originally posted by WhiteRice


You didn't, just throwing my $.02 in there, that's all....you'd mentioned Si's and Dx's had them, so I thought I'd finish the thought and say HF's didn't!!! :fawk:


haha... yeah, ok. at first i was just like *oook.. this guy can't read* but it alll worked out. yeah.. HF's don't have anything... they're good for getting 60 miles to the gallon.. but annnyways :-p
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 10:38 AM
  #25  
ISP James's Avatar
ISP James
Thread Starter
DAMIMRED
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty




haha... yeah, ok. at first i was just like *oook.. this guy can't read* but it alll worked out. yeah.. HF's don't have anything... they're good for getting 60 miles to the gallon.. but annnyways :-p
b18a + turbo = not good for getting 16 mpg
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 10:38 AM
  #26  
ISP James's Avatar
ISP James
Thread Starter
DAMIMRED
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

whoaaaaaa i fked that up i meant 60 not 16 whoops!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 11:12 AM
  #27  
WhiteRice's Avatar
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

HAHA Didn't even notice that...damn!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #28  
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: san Diego, CA
Default

hahah... yeah, the HF STOCK is good for getting 60 miles to the gallon :P
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 05:14 PM
  #29  
eg9's Avatar
eg9
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Sloville
Default

si=heavy
heavy=slow
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 10:39 AM
  #30  
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: san Diego, CA
Default

hf + b18 + turbo + upgraded suspension to handle the weight = marginally lighter than Si, and an Si has a sunroof

si + b18 + turbo= not as much of a need for a better and more expensive suspension, and they have a sunroof

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM.