is there a difference in a lx or ex in motor wise in a 2003 honda accord:thumbup:

 

no difference between the LX, and the EX when it comes to both the 4cyl motor, and the v6 motor.

The same applies to 98-02 Accords (6th gen)

 

yep, honda decided to stop discriminating and give lx owners a decent motor. they still don't get a moonroof and alloys though

 

bah moonroof is no biggie. as far as the alloys, that's where aftermarket rims come in :thumbup:. the leather interior would've been nice, and steering wheel-mounted controls. oh yea and the electronic brake distribution, and rear wheel disc brakes.

 

lolol good one your right:thumbup:

 

heh, i don't really mind leather or moonroof, but i never really use the moonroof anyways. However, i prefer an EX over and LX.

 

For me, the moonroof is a negative, as I need the headroom. I couldn't drive an EX if I had to. Leather is nice, but an expensive luxury, as are the OEM wheels . All the other stuff (EBD, TCS, steering wheel controls, all wheel discs) did come standard on my LX V6 Coupe, as well as the 6 disc changer.

 

honestly i really love a moonroof. there's only a handful of cars i could live w/out in an ITR, WRX, and 350Z.

the stock alloys wheels are nice, cause you can still look good in the winter and you cam roll on alloys for while before buying rims. you can do the performance and suspension mods before rims, whereas otherwise you want rims before anything else.

imo, i like rolling on stock alloys.

of course rear disc brakes are nice too, drums look dumb with big rims.

i can live w/out leather though.

 

:werd:
But a moonroof is a must! I use mine everyday!

 

The main thing that sucks about my LX is those damn drums out back. I've been looking at parts for a conversion (basically cosmetic) but still deciding.