Notices

I got a new old school Accord...

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #11  
99accord's Avatar
99accord
www.poksquid.com
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Guam/Las Vegas
Default

good find!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #12  
offthahook's Avatar
offthahook
Thread Starter
Reppin' the 317, SUCKA!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by ItsaHonda
Very nice and clean! I had an 83 Accord SE sedan that I bought earlier this year and drove it for a while after I sold my 1981 Civic wagon. Good solid, reliable car that is still going strong today with the new owner. Ditto for the 81 Civic wagon. I'd like to find a 1st gen Accord in good condition (76-81 model) to tool around in. Most turned into rust buckets if not preserved.. so they are hard to come by... but their CVCC engines are bullet proof.

Good luck with it.
1st generation Accords had head gasket failures. Honda knows about it and did a limited TSB/Goodwill replacement. I believe they changed the head bolts in 1981 and it was all good. My 78 blew a head gasket at 156K (not bad IMO)
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #13  
ItsaHonda's Avatar
ItsaHonda
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

Correct, head gaskets were an issue for the early CVCC engines. My 81 Civic had already had the head gasket replaced, though I wasn't sure about the
83. I don't believe the problem was ever truly resolved until the 1.3, 1.6 and 1.8 engines were redesigned in 1984 (dropping the cvcc design) But otherwise, they were very reliable and durable little motors. The carbs were another issue, but they usually didn't start acting up til well over 100,000 miles. My 83 still has the original carb with over 180,000 miles.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #14  
sibiryk's Avatar
sibiryk
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

Maybe $2100 isn't too much. It might come a collector's tresure car( if not already)
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 05:51 PM
  #15  
offthahook's Avatar
offthahook
Thread Starter
Reppin' the 317, SUCKA!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by sibiryk
Maybe $2100 isn't too much. It might come a collector's tresure car( if not already)
It's kind of a treasure to me in a way. EXACTLY like my 85 (probably better), except my 85 had a spot of rust over the rear wheel arch. These are just so rare that I had to get on it for old times sake... I sold the 85 to a coworker, and got a nice 89 se-i coupe in the brittany blue-- gorgeous whip.

Originally Posted by ItsaHonda
Correct, head gaskets were an issue for the early CVCC engines. My 81 Civic had already had the head gasket replaced, though I wasn't sure about the
83. I don't believe the problem was ever truly resolved until the 1.3, 1.6 and 1.8 engines were redesigned in 1984 (dropping the cvcc design) But otherwise, they were very reliable and durable little motors.
I don't know about the CVCC configuration being dropped. my 84 has a sticker that says "CVCC stratified engine" on the inner side of the hood. However, it is a different engine and I haven't heard of any head gaskets being a problem on the gen. 2.5's.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 PM.