Notices

gsr vs accord v6

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #11  
V6Per4mance's Avatar
V6Per4mance
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default wow calm down dang!! hahah haters shyt...lol

yeah my cord is a 6th gen and since everyone is sayin because of the accords weight its slow so my question now weight reduction? will that help? aye i know accords arent made to race people but shit doesnt hurt trying... and for that person who said "pick on stock integras" i also have a 95 GSX eclipse SO gsr/s aint got shyt on me, all i wanted to know is why the accord felt slower with so much mods...no haters,, thanxxx
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #12  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

Originally Posted by V6Per4mance
(aem cold air intake, greddy catback, comptech headers) and SINCE ITS A V6 what went wrong??? help... the only reason i have is that i got a huge sub box , worn out front tires and i let him have a head start..
hello! here's your reason. you have bolt on's and all this other crap and seriously expected to beat him? im suprised you even caught and kept up with him.

yes you need lots of help :a:
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

...Wow
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #14  
twin3037's Avatar
twin3037
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: mckinney texas
Default

i've been on this forum for like 1-2 years now and that has to be the dumbest post i've read so far. not the i didn't know a gs-r was faster but the way he worded it, just makes me remeber how much i hate people that try toa ct hardcore
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #15  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

accord=grandma
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #16  
PikkaGTR's Avatar
PikkaGTR
Power of Dreams
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Ca
Default

Originally Posted by wedley2

wrx's can do like 12's with like no add-ons, lol...so im not sure where you are pulling your info.
the WRX stock is a high to mid 14 second car
an STi is a low 13 second car with about 300 hp/6spd MT
how in the world will a WRX do "like 12s" with no bolt ons?
"im not sure where you are pulling YOUR info" :squint:
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #17  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

True story
Old Feb 5, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #18  
twin3037's Avatar
twin3037
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: mckinney texas
Default

i imagine he was thinking about an sti, and i've seen stock wrx run low low 14's, if u completlly suck at lunching the car u might be able to pull a high 14
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
wedley2's Avatar
wedley2
bboy Wesley West
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Default

Originally Posted by PikkaGTR
the WRX stock is a high to mid 14 second car
an STi is a low 13 second car with about 300 hp/6spd MT
how in the world will a WRX do "like 12s" with no bolt ons?
"im not sure where you are pulling YOUR info" :squint:
i remember seeing a vid of a wrx with a downpipe and a ecu upgrade hitting 12's....or maybe it was 13's...

it was somewhere around there
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
Cosmo M3's Avatar
Cosmo M3
Lurker
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

you got cocky cuz you got a V6 y0! DANG! You lost to a GSR? SHIET! A Civic Si will beat j00! y0!

No but seriously, you obviously don't know much about cars since you're asking us why you lost to a GSR. I bet a stock LS with bolt-ons will beat you.

also: Intake, Header, Exhaust =/= "so much mods"

If you want a fast car, get another car.

An S2000 is a 4 cylinder, can you beat that?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 PM.