according to these people CTR's are better

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/t404011.html

 

yet again that is on personal prefrence not which one is more aggresive...

 

I posted this thread on Honda-Tech so lets see what they think

http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1356638

 

i am not intrested in what they think but more on the fact cause i am curious to know, cause i am pretty sure that i am right about what i am saying, but i would love to see if i am ahhahaha or NOT either way i will be more informed which is most important to me!

 

yep

 

k here is skunks stage 1 i believe duration .252 intake .249 exhaust CTR .243 intake exhuast .235

 

Bickering over maybe 1-2 hp....

The facts show that the Skunk2 is mildly more aggressive than the CTR cams. Since you have found a way to contradict everything stated in this thread go with the damn CTR cams already.

 

what am I contradicting? if I am not going to upgrade my valvetrain I am either putting in Skunk2 Stage 1's or CTR's I just want to know which one would be better

 

You are contradicting the fact with opinion. Again, the specs show that the Skunk2 is a little more aggressive than the CTR cams, but only a negligible amount.

Better? As in what sense? Knowing the stage 1 cams have a longer duration? Spending less for the same amount of power? Better build?

Obviously, the CTR cams are the better choice because they are cheaper, offer better build quality, and give about the same amount of power.

 

ok CTR's I will go with then, thanks Shmoo, again for that expert advise