I'm reading this as the conclusion:

"Afghanistan and Iraq are the two parts of the consolidation phase of this war. al Qaeda had to be crippled and Saddam has to be destroyed in order to gain us time and adequate safety to go onto the offensive, and to begin the process which will truly end this war: to destroy Wahhabism, to shatter Islamic fundamentalism, to completely break the will of the Arabs and to totally shame them."

Fundamentalism in any form is bad. The problem is that there's too strong of a connection between conservative politics in this country and Christianity for the same conservatives to make an argument against fundamentalism. There is no difference between Islamic and Christian fundamentalism--both cause the same problems. Christian fundamentalism, because it exists in western states that are no longer theocracies, does not have the same influence over legislation as in Islamic nations but it is still fundamentalism. The goal here expressed by the author of this essay is the defeat of Islamic fundamentalism at the hands of Christian fundamentalism. Just because one becomes dominant over the other does not solve the root cause of the problem.