View Single Post
Old May 8, 2003 | 10:08 AM
  #69  
flpngino's Avatar
flpngino
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

To say VW's are an "overall better performing car" than some of the cars that have been mentioned in this thread is a bit presumptuous. From my experience, knowledge, reading, etc., VW has reliability issues and I am not much for the VW technology/engineering. Also, it's pretty bad when 3 year old certified pre-owned vehicles which are supposed to represent the best a car can look at that age doesn't impress me.

Also, The Si is about $16k (160 hp). The Spec V is about $17k (175 hp). The GTI ranges from $19k - $22k. Usually each extra thousand financed is about $20/month for a 5 year loan (generally speaking, of course). If I'm going to spend that amount of money, I might as well look at an Accord or TSX (love the TSX!). If indeed the CTR comes into fruition, i would be looking at an estimated $19k for a naturally aspirated 200 hp car.

Lastly, TURBOCHARGED 180 hp? Not impressive at all, regardless of the times you claim. If i wanted to go the forced induction route, I could do it with many of the cars I'm looking at and have a better machine for about the same price.

Originally posted by milkman2k52
Well to argue the impressiveness of the 20v 1.8l motor, there have been gtis that run low 12's on stock internals. I think 10's would be attainable if you really tried

I guess you have had a bad personal experience or something with vws though and its too bad because you turned away an overall better performing car with more potential.
Reply