This is based of a Jackson Racing Supercharger on a H22...ON the Dyno make at least 235hp after modifiying the fuel and pulleys...For the buck..Sc is for the most cheaper. On a turbo to run 11's or 12's you would not only invest in, lets say for example. INtercooler,Injectors,Fuel Pump,Fuel rail,Modified Ecu or piggy back ECU,Piping (not including cost to weld)PIstons,Rings,Valve's,gaskets,TUrbo,Blow off valve,BOost controller,Clutch to go with the boost,the Gauges to see the boost and the heat that the turbo create's. but, the maintainance alone will kill you if your on a budget. You buy a SC a fuel pump,injectors some pulleys and your done. A turbo requires a little more love and care to be efficient. For the buck yea you can engineer some stuff together but, after the race should you call the towing company? To run some 11's or high 12's? I feel the money you put into a street turbo car,which by the way on a H22 with mostly factory part in the engine you MIGHT get away with a high 13 @ 15lbs of boost(factory eclipse turbo)tweeked waste gate. You will be lucky if you have a head gasket to take you home. Those H22 come off the line with like 10:1 compression /f23 9:1. You do the math. Ive played this game too long and learn to get out before your bankrupt. And for you Nighshade....I dont know you, but what ever your pulling with how turbo's are much better...One note..If its strictly a track toy then yes I would put one on. Otherwise a perfectly born NA aspirated motor like the H22...... Go all motor or maybe if you got big one's go SuperCharged. But definitely on the local streets not turbo'd..This would break your wallet. We have tested the F22 vtec block on a Eclipse turbo we barely got to the 14's at 15lbs. That thing went through more head gasket's.... Maybe this came out the wrong way, but i'm tired of the whole you can turbo anything and it will last forever concept. That doesnt exist. Not on a daily driver type car.