I am gainst it but not really sure how valid my argument is at this point because I have given up kinda on the entire subject since its moot at this point....but here goes my reasoning..

I think the pretense that it is a preemptive strike is a bit vague. If this is a valid reason to attack another country then why not attack Mexico because they may try to flood the orders with bomb carrying mules (I dunno but you get the idea). Basically it is pening the doors to a whole new way to wage war with anyone we don't agree with politically.

The other reason this war is so hated in my eyes is that originally weren't we chasing Osama for the 9/11 attack...or was that just a ploy to get the people to back an attack? and why haven't we heard anything more on "the hunt for Osama"? It would seem we would finish something valid before going on a tangent about an arms treaty that has been put on the wayside for 12 years or so.

I dunno I still think the attack on 9/11 was just a vehicle to get into the middle east. I know it sounds conspiracy theory and all but I really do wonder about the validity of all this in light of the way Osama has been dropped for a bigger better target.