View Single Post
Old 01-02-2003, 09:07 PM
  #12  
yianni64
Senior Member
 
yianni64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by MrFatBooty
200 hp does not bode well. If it were RWD it would be excusable but all you get in a TSX is a slightly smaller (although not by much) and more luxurious Accord. Ya ya it's just the base model but with no higher-hp Type-S model to create a halo effect what's there to bring people into the showrooms?

Tons of people buy Eclipses, mainly on its reputation as a "high performance" car as created by the 15% that were sold as turbos. Same deal with Integras, RSXes and Celicas too really. People think about getting the GSR, Type-S or GT-S and then decide that the higher price, premium gas only and extra insurance costs aren't worth it so they go for a lower-down model. Hell, companies will even try to cash in on halo models that aren't even sold in this market. Witness the Mitsubishi Lancer O.Z. Rally edition and first generation Subaru Impreza 2.5RS.

The TSX and Accord are just too similar in price point and overall feel that there needs to be something to distinguish the TSX aside from an 'A' badge and a perceived increase in sportiness.
As for the Type S thing, good point, but not really. Upgrading to a Type S is so cheap, another 2-3k doesnt sound that bad when you considering what you get.

As for the TSX vs. Accord, it'd say its like Passat vs A4. They (especially before A4 get redone) shared a lot, yet managed to be different.

I hope we see an AWD option in the upcoming Acura's. The techonology is there, it just needs to be implamented.