Originally Posted by
white_n_slow
Here's a repost for you guys:
I'm thinking about picking up something for home protection and occasional outdoor target practice. Give me the pros vs. cons on a handgun or shotgun.
Seems like a shotgun would be where it's at for home protection due to intimidation factor, aiming doesn't have to be as precise, ability to beat somebody with it if you're out of ammo (would this be stupid?). The major drawback, of course, is size. I can't think of anywhere inconspicuous to put a shotgun in my room where I would still be able to get to it on short notice. I'm not a Texan and I'm not just going to lean that shit in the corner of my room.
I've never owned a gun, but I've tried out a pretty decent variety since many of my friends own or work in law enforcement.
I'm partial to shotguns for home defense. They generally have greater stopping power than handguns, are less liable to overpenetrate, and you are more likely to hit your target, provided you are properly shouldering and pointing the shotgun. Downsides, more collateral damage, they are less maneuverable around corners, and easier to take away from you in a struggle because the perp can grab the end of the barrel and gain more leverage. Handguns are easily concealed, more maneuverable, easier to hold on to in a struggle. Handguns require well aimed shots (difficult to do under pressure), have less stopping power, and have more potential to overpenetrate.
Though there are drawbacks, shotgun is my weapon of choice for home defense/zombie invasion. If you are well trained and practice frequently, a handgun will also serve you well. Or you can just get both.
On a side note, if I lived in the boonies and had no neighbors within a 5 mile radius, I think the AR-15 or M1A would become my weapon of choice.