I just realized how badly written my post was so I edited it for clarification.

In the wild the rat has a chance of survival. Also national geographic does not film the prey in a way so that you get attached to it and then fucking straight up feeds them and films them in the most gorriest way possible. Even the music supports the intention of shocking from the poster. NG has info, support and is informative. It's like comparing Michelangelo's David to porn.

Just for the record I'm not an animal lover... Don't have any pets and i hate rodents.