Originally Posted by
Nightshade
So let me get this straight, you are questioning the Times article because of the info you read on the Wiki?? :rofl:
You need to find better sources my man:af:
No, I'm questioning the Times article because the wiki lists two references that suggest otherwise. I went from Times article to wiki because the number seemed too large to believe. It just happens that someone already updated the wiki with the Times estimate, but there's no indication from NYT where that ridiculous number came from.